» Articles » PMID: 24502435

New Quality Monitoring Tools Provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: CUSUM

Overview
Journal Am J Transplant
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2014 Feb 8
PMID 24502435
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) has been providing data on transplant program performance through semi-annual release of program-specific reports (PSRs). A consensus conference held in February 2012 recommended that SRTR also supply transplant programs with tools such as the cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique to facilitate quality assessment and performance improvement. SRTR developed the process, methodologies, programming code and web capabilities necessary to bring the CUSUM charts to the community, and began releasing them to all liver, kidney, heart and lung programs in July 2013. Observed-minus-expected CUSUM charts provide a general picture of a program's performance (all-cause graft failure and mortality within the first-year posttransplant) over a 3-year period; one-sided charts can determine when performance appears to be sufficiently worrisome to warrant action by the program. CUSUM charts are intended for internal quality improvement by allowing programs to better track performance in near-real time and day to day, and will not be used to indicate whether a program will be flagged for review. The CUSUM technique is better suited for real-time quality monitoring than the current PSRs in allowing monthly outcomes monitoring and presenting data recorded as recently as 2 months before the release of the CUSUM charts.

Citing Articles

Deep Learning-Adjusted Monitoring of In-Hospital Mortality after Liver Transplantation.

Borner N, Schoenberg M, Pollmann B, Poschke P, Bohm C, Koch D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39457996 PMC: 11508396. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206046.


Within-hospital Temporal Clustering of Postoperative Complications and Implications for Safety Monitoring and Benchmarking Using ACS-NSQIP Data.

Cohen M, Liu Y, Ko C, Hall B Ann Surg Open. 2024; 5(3):e483.

PMID: 39310333 PMC: 11415087. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000483.


Variability in donor organ offer acceptance and lung transplantation survival.

Mulvihill M, Lee H, Weber J, Choi A, Cox M, Yerokun B J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020; 39(4):353-362.

PMID: 32029400 PMC: 7089807. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.12.010.


Heart and lung organ offer acceptance practices of transplant programs are associated with waitlist mortality and organ yield.

Wey A, Valapour M, Skeans M, Salkowski N, Colvin M, Kasiske B Am J Transplant. 2018; 18(8):2061-2067.

PMID: 29673099 PMC: 6836691. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14885.


Measuring transplant center performance: The goals are not controversial but the methods and consequences can be.

Jay C, Schold J Curr Transplant Rep. 2017; 4(1):52-58.

PMID: 28966901 PMC: 5616160. DOI: 10.1007/s40472-017-0138-9.