» Articles » PMID: 24498322

Investigating the Flow Dynamics in the Obstructed and Stented Ureter by Means of a Biomimetic Artificial Model

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Feb 6
PMID 24498322
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Double-J stenting is the most common clinical method employed to restore the upper urinary tract drainage, in the presence of a ureteric obstruction. After implant, stents provide an immediate pain relief by decreasing the pressure in the renal pelvis (P). However, their long-term usage can cause infections and encrustations, due to bacterial colonization and crystal deposition on the stent surface, respectively. The performance of double-J stents - and in general of all ureteric stents - is thought to depend significantly on urine flow field within the stented ureter. However very little fundamental research about the role played by fluid dynamic parameters on stent functionality has been conducted so far. These parameters are often difficult to assess in-vivo, requiring the implementation of laborious and expensive experimental protocols. The aim of the present work was therefore to develop an artificial model of the ureter (i.e. ureter model, UM) to mimic the fluid dynamic environment in a stented ureter. The UM was designed to reflect the geometry of pig ureters, and to investigate the values of fluid dynamic viscosity (μ), volumetric flow rate (Q) and severity of ureteric obstruction (OB%) which may cause critical pressures in the renal pelvis. The distributed obstruction derived by the sole stent insertion was also quantified. In addition, flow visualisation experiments and computational simulations were performed in order to further characterise the flow field in the UM. Unique characteristics of the flow dynamics in the obstructed and stented ureter have been revealed with using the developed UM.

Citing Articles

Artificial urinary bladder model.

Read B, Tan Sze Wuan A, Pietropaolo A, Somani B, Carugo D, Mosayyebi A Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2024; 238(6):588-597.

PMID: 39077929 PMC: 11318201. DOI: 10.1177/09544119241262372.


Novel anti-reflux ureteral skirt: proof of concept in a Yorkshire-Landrace pig model.

Lu Y, Tay J, Lim K, Ng L World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):437.

PMID: 39046550 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05157-0.


Evaluation of renovated double J stents using ureter models with and without stenosis.

Choi Y, Kang H, Kim K, Jo M, Islam M, Kim J World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):228.

PMID: 38598022 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04920-7.


Investigating the encrustation of reinforced ureteral stents by computational flow dynamic simulations.

Vogt B World J Urol. 2023; 41(5):1451-1457.

PMID: 36930252 PMC: 10188399. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04356-5.


Fluid mechanical performance of ureteral stents: The role of side hole and lumen size.

Zheng S, Obrist D, Burkhard F, Clavica F Bioeng Transl Med. 2023; 8(2):e10407.

PMID: 36925692 PMC: 10013766. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10407.


References
1.
MARDIS H, KROEGER R, Hepperlen T, Mazer M, KAMMANDEL H . Polyethylene double-pigtail ureteral stents. Urol Clin North Am. 1982; 9(1):95-101. View

2.
Docherty N, OSullivan O, Healy D, Fitzpatrick J, Watson R . Evidence that inhibition of tubular cell apoptosis protects against renal damage and development of fibrosis following ureteric obstruction. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005; 290(1):F4-13. DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00045.2005. View

3.
Brewer A, Elbahnasy A, Bercowsky E, Maxwell K, Shalhav A, Kahn S . Mechanism of ureteral stent flow: a comparative in vivo study. J Endourol. 1999; 13(4):269-71. DOI: 10.1089/end.1999.13.269. View

4.
Kundu S, Eggener S . Retroperitoneal lymph nodes in transitional cell carcinoma of the kidney and ureter. Adv Urol. 2009; :181927. PMC: 2630418. DOI: 10.1155/2009/181927. View

5.
Waters S, Heaton K, Siggers J, Bayston R, Bishop M, Cummings L . Ureteric stents: investigating flow and encrustation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008; 222(4):551-61. DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM317. View