» Articles » PMID: 24497594

Predictors of Residual Renal Function Decline in Patients Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Overview
Journal Perit Dial Int
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2014 Feb 6
PMID 24497594
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Residual renal function (RRF) is an important prognostic indicator in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. We determined the predictors of RRF loss in a cohort of incident CAPD patients.

Methods: We reviewed the record of 645 incident CAPD patients. RRF loss is represented by the slope of decline of residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as well as the time to anuria.

Results: The average rate of residual GFR decline was -0.083 ± 0.094 mL/min/month. The rate of residual GFR decline was faster with a higher proteinuria (r = -0.506, p < 0.0001) and baseline residual GFR (r = -0.560, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that proteinuria, baseline residual GFR, and the use of diuretics were independent predictors of residual GFR decline. Cox proportional hazard model showed that proteinuria, glucose exposure, and the number of peritonitis episodes were independent predictors of progression to anuria, while a higher baseline GFR was protective. Each 1 g/day of proteinuria is associated with a 13.2% increase in the risk of progressing to anuria, each 10 g/day higher glucose exposure is associated with a 2.5% increase in risk, while each peritonitis episode confers a 3.8% increase in risk.

Conclusions: Our study shows that factors predicting the loss of residual solute clearance and urine output are different. Proteinuria, baseline residual GFR, and the use of diuretics are independently related to the rate of RRF decline in CAPD patients, while proteinuria, glucose exposure, and the number of peritonitis episodes are independent predictors for the development of anuria. The role of anti-proteinuric therapy and measures to prevent peritonitis episodes in the preservation of RRF should be tested in future studies.

Citing Articles

Early Anuria in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Associated Clinical Outcomes.

Tu S, Ye H, Xin Y, Peng Y, Liu R, Guo J Kidney Med. 2024; 6(10):100882.

PMID: 39247762 PMC: 11380388. DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100882.


Effect of a Management Algorithm for Wet Contamination of Peritoneal Dialysis System on the Prevention of Peritonitis: A Prospective Observational Study.

Yi C, Zhang W, Guo Q, Lin J, Chen W, Mao H Kidney Dis (Basel). 2024; 10(4):295-302.

PMID: 39131886 PMC: 11309752. DOI: 10.1159/000539582.


Rate and reasons for peritoneal dialysis dropout following haemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis switch: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sun X, McKeaveney C, Shields J, Chan C, Henderson M, Fitzell F BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):99.

PMID: 38493084 PMC: 10943899. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03542-w.


Influencing factors for residual kidney function in incident peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhou D, Lei H, Wu S, Yang W, Cui W, Li L Ren Fail. 2023; 45(2):2286328.

PMID: 38036948 PMC: 11011231. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2286328.


A Review of Residual Kidney Function in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Alrowiyti I, Bargman J Indian J Nephrol. 2023; 33(4):239-246.

PMID: 37781547 PMC: 10503572. DOI: 10.4103/ijn.ijn_242_23.


References
1.
Jansen M, Hart A, Korevaar J, Dekker F, Boeschoten E, Krediet R . Predictors of the rate of decline of residual renal function in incident dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002; 62(3):1046-53. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00505.x. View

2.
. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996; 7(2):198-207. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V72198. View

3.
Liao C, Chen Y, Shiao C, Hu F, Huang J, Kao T . Rate of decline of residual renal function is associated with all-cause mortality and technique failure in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009; 24(9):2909-14. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp056. View

4.
Krediet R, Boeschoten E, Zuyderhoudt F, Strackee J, Arisz L . Simple assessment of the efficacy of peritoneal transport in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Blood Purif. 1986; 4(4):194-203. DOI: 10.1159/000169445. View

5.
Twardowski Z . PET--a simpler approach for determining prescriptions for adequate dialysis therapy. Adv Perit Dial. 1990; 6:186-91. View