Hip Imaging of Avascular Necrosis at 7 Tesla Compared with 3 Tesla

Overview

Journal Skeletal Radiol

Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology

Date 2014 Feb 6

PMID 24496584

Citations 7

Authors

J M Theysohn

O Kraff

N Theysohn

S Orzada

S Landgraeber

M E Ladd

T C Lauenstein

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare ultra-high field, high-resolution bilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hips at 7 Tesla (T) with 3 T MRI in patients with avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head by subjective image evaluations, contrast measurements, and evaluation of the appearance of imaging abnormalities.

Materials And Methods: Thirteen subjects with avascular necrosis treated using advanced core decompression underwent MRI at both 7 T and 3 T. Sequence parameters as well as resolution were kept identical for both field strengths. All MR images (MEDIC, DESS, PD/T2w TSE, T1w TSE, and STIR) were evaluated by two radiologists with regard to subjective image quality, soft tissue contrasts, B1 homogeneity (four-point scale, higher values indicating better image quality) and depiction of imaging abnormalities of the femoral heads (three-point scale, higher values indicating the superiority of 7 T). Contrast ratios of soft tissues were calculated and compared with subjective data.

Results: 7-T imaging of the femoral joints, as well as 3-T imaging, achieved "good" to "very good" quality in all sequences. 7 T showed significantly higher soft tissue contrasts for T2w and MEDIC compared with 3 T (cartilage/fluid: 2.9 vs 2.2 and 3.6 vs 2.6), better detailed resolution for cartilage defects (PDw, T2w, T1w, MEDIC, DESS > 2.5) and better visibility of joint effusions (MEDIC 2.6; PDw/T2w 2.4; DESS 2.2). Image homogeneity compared with 3 T (3.9-4.0 for all sequences) was degraded, especially in TSE sequences at 7 T through signal variations (7 T: 2.1-2.9); to a lesser extent also GRE sequences (7 T: 2.9-3.5). Imaging findings related to untreated or treated AVN were better delineated at 3 T (≤1.8), while joint effusions (2.2-2.6) and cartilage defects (2.5-3.0) were better visualized at 7 T. STIR performed much more poorly at 7 T, generating large contrast variations (1.5).

Conclusions: 7-T hip MRI showed comparable results in hip joint imaging compared with 3 T with slight advantages in contrast detail (cartilage defects) and fluid detection at 7 T when accepting image degradation medially.

Citing Articles

Current and Future Advanced Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Early Osteoarthritis of the Hip.

Mills E, Becerra J, Yensen K, Bolia I, Shontz E, Kebaish K Orthop Res Rev. 2022; 14:327-338.

PMID: 36131944 PMC: 9482955. DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S357498.

Investigations of Cartilage Matrix Degeneration in Patients with Early-Stage Femoral Head Necrosis.

Xu R, Wei B, Li J, Huang C, Lin R, Tang C Med Sci Monit. 2017; 23:5783-5792.

PMID: 29208853 PMC: 5727749. DOI: 10.12659/msm.907522.

The role of imaging in diagnosis and management of femoral head avascular necrosis.

Manenti G, Altobelli S, Pugliese L, Tarantino U Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2016; 12(Suppl 1):31-8.

PMID: 27134630 PMC: 4832402. DOI: 10.11138/ccmbm/2015.12.3s.031.

7 Tesla quantitative hip MRI: a comparison between TESS and CPMG for T2 mapping.

Kraff O, Lazik-Palm A, Heule R, Theysohn J, Bieri O, Quick H MAGMA. 2016; 29(3):503-12.

PMID: 27112156 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0557-0.

Morphological imaging and T2 and T2* mapping of hip cartilage at 7 Tesla MRI under the influence of intravenous gadolinium.

Lazik-Palm A, Kraff O, Geis C, Johst S, Goebel J, Ladd M Eur Radiol. 2016; 26(11):3923-3931.

PMID: 26873493 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4247-0.

References

Snyder C, Delabarre L, Moeller S, Tian J, Akgun C, Van de Moortele P . Comparison between eight- and sixteen-channel TEM transceive arrays for body imaging at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 67(4):954-64. PMC: 3290686. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23070. View

Saini A, Saifuddin A . MRI of osteonecrosis. Clin Radiol. 2004; 59(12):1079-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.04.014. View

Lavernia C, Sierra R, Grieco F . Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999; 7(4):250-61. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199907000-00005. View

Plancher K, Razi A . Management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997; 28(3):461-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70302-3. View

Kollia K, Maderwald S, Putzki N, Schlamann M, Theysohn J, Kraff O . First clinical study on ultra-high-field MR imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of 1.5T and 7T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(4):699-702. PMC: 7051774. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1434. View

Deligianni X, Bar P, Scheffler K, Trattnig S, Bieri O . High-resolution Fourier-encoded sub-millisecond echo time musculoskeletal imaging at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 70(5):1434-9. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24578. View

Iwata T, Nozawa S, Dohjima T, Yamamoto T, Ishimaru D, Tsugita M . The value of T1-weighted coronal MRI scans in diagnosing occult fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(7):969-73. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B7.28693. View

Kramer J, Breitenseher M, Imhof H, Urban M, Plenk Jr H, Hofmann S . [Diagnostic imaging in femur head necrosis]. Orthopade. 2000; 29(5):380-8. DOI: 10.1007/s001320050459. View

Ikemura S, Yamamoto T, Motomura G, Nakashima Y, Mawatari T, Iwamoto Y . MRI evaluation of collapsed femoral heads in patients 60 years old or older: Differentiation of subchondral insufficiency fracture from osteonecrosis of the femoral head. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(1):W63-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3271. View

10.

Nordmeyer-Massner J, Wyss M, Andreisek G, Pruessmann K, Hodler J . In vitro and in vivo comparison of wrist MR imaging at 3.0 and 7.0 tesla using a gradient echo sequence and identical eight-channel coil array designs. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(3):661-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22419. View

11.

Landgraeber S, Theysohn J, Classen T, Jager M, Warwas S, Hohn H . Advanced core decompression, a new treatment option of avascular necrosis of the femoral head--a first follow-up. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2012; 7(11):893-900. DOI: 10.1002/term.1481. View

12.

Winter L, Kellman P, Renz W, Grassl A, Hezel F, Thalhammer C . Comparison of three multichannel transmit/receive radiofrequency coil configurations for anatomic and functional cardiac MRI at 7.0T: implications for clinical imaging. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(10):2211-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2487-1. View

13.

Trattnig S, Zbyn S, Schmitt B, Friedrich K, Juras V, Szomolanyi P . Advanced MR methods at ultra-high field (7 Tesla) for clinical musculoskeletal applications. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(11):2338-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2508-0. View

14.

Bluemke D, Zerhouni E . MRI of avascular necrosis of bone. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1996; 8(4):231-46. DOI: 10.1097/00002142-199608000-00003. View

15.

Childs A, Malik S, ORegan D, Hajnal J . Impact of number of channels on RF shimming at 3T. MAGMA. 2013; 26(4):401-10. PMC: 3728430. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-012-0360-5. View

16.

Hecht E, Lee R, Taouli B, Sodickson D . Perspectives on body MR imaging at ultrahigh field. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007; 15(3):449-65, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.07.001. View

17.

Deniz C, Brown R, Lattanzi R, Alon L, Sodickson D, Zhu Y . Maximum efficiency radiofrequency shimming: Theory and initial application for hip imaging at 7 tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(5):1379-88. PMC: 3478493. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24377. View

18.

Theysohn J, Kraff O, Orzada S, Theysohn N, Classen T, Landgraeber S . Bilateral hip imaging at 7 Tesla using a multi-channel transmit technology: initial results presenting anatomical detail in healthy volunteers and pathological changes in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Skeletal Radiol. 2013; 42(11):1555-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1698-0. View

19.

Suttie J, Delabarre L, Pitcher A, Van de Moortele P, Dass S, Snyder C . 7 Tesla (T) human cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using FLASH and SSFP to assess cardiac function: validation against 1.5 T and 3 T. NMR Biomed. 2011; 25(1):27-34. PMC: 3440016. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1708. View

20.

Vaughan J, Garwood M, Collins C, Liu W, Delabarre L, Adriany G . 7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 46(1):24-30. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1156. View