» Articles » PMID: 24493070

Role of Ki-67 Proliferation Index in the Assessment of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasias Regarding the Stage of Disease

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2014 Feb 5
PMID 24493070
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NEN) of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system frequently present with metastatic deposits. The proliferation marker Ki-67 is used for diagnosis and to assess the prognosis of disease. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of Ki-67 % in the assessment of NEN patients with regard to their disease stage in clinical practice. Additionally, a comparative analysis of Ki-67 levels among different sites of disease was performed.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with GEP NEN referred to our center from 2010 to 2012. The NEN diagnosis was confirmed by standard histopathology. Ki-67 immunohistochemistry was done on paraffin-embedded sections using an automated Leica immunohistochemistry machine. NEN grading was carried out according to European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society recommendations (low grade [G1] to intermediate grade [G2], well to moderately differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms; high-grade [G3], moderately to poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms). Results of tumor staging and grading were correlated. In a subgroup of cases, comparative analysis of Ki-67 levels in different sites of disease was carried out.

Results: One hundred sixty-one GEP NEN patients were included in the study. Metastatic disease was seen in 46.1 % (53/115) of G1 tumors, 77.8 % (28/36) of G2 tumors, and 100 % of (10/10) G3 tumors (p = 0.0002). When stratified according to primary tumor site, metastatic disease was documented in 42.9 % (36/84) of patients with pancreatic NEN and in 91.9 % (34/37) of those with small intestinal primary. Stage IV metastatic disease was present in 27.8 % (32/115) and 72.2 % (26/36) of the G1 and G2 tumors, respectively, and in 90 % (9/10) of the G3 tumors. Assessment of the Ki-67 index for a subset of cases at metastatic sites as well as the primary tumor site showed discrepancies in 35.3 % cases. In 7/9 (77.8 %) patients with liver metastases, Ki-67 % was higher in the liver lesions than in the primary tumor.

Conclusions: Patients with GEP NEN exhibiting a high Ki-67 proliferation index present with metastatic disease in the vast majority of cases. Depending upon the primary tumor site, metastases are to be expected also in tumors with low Ki-67 %, although they are considered less aggressive. Different disease sites may express heterogeneous Ki-67 levels.

Citing Articles

Innovative approaches in predicting outcomes for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Nassar M, Baraka B, Talal A World J Gastroenterol. 2025; 31(6):100517.

PMID: 39958439 PMC: 11752703. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i6.100517.


Quantitative immunohistochemistry analysis of breast Ki67 based on artificial intelligence.

Wang W, Gong Y, Chen B, Guo H, Wang Q, Li J Open Life Sci. 2025; 19(1):20221013.

PMID: 39845722 PMC: 11751672. DOI: 10.1515/biol-2022-1013.


Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for the Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review.

Palaniappan V, Li C, Frilling A, Clift A J Pers Med. 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37888039 PMC: 10607978. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13101428.


Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumours: 10 Years' Experience at a Tertiary Referral Centre.

Clift A, Drymousis P, von Roon A, Humphries A, Goldin R, Bomanji J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760408 PMC: 10526159. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184438.


Prognostic Implications of PET-Derived Tumor Volume and Uptake in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Weber M, Telli T, Kersting D, Seifert R Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(14).

PMID: 37509242 PMC: 10377105. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143581.


References
1.
Haug A, Cindea-Drimus R, Auernhammer C, Reincke M, Wangler B, Uebleis C . The role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in suspected neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(11):1686-92. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101675. View

2.
Gerlinger M, Rowan A, Horswell S, Math M, Larkin J, Endesfelder D . Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(10):883-892. PMC: 4878653. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113205. View

3.
Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard A, Krenning E, Oberg K, Steinmuller T . ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology. 2012; 95(2):157-76. DOI: 10.1159/000335597. View

4.
Boninsegna L, Panzuto F, Partelli S, Capelli P, Delle Fave G, Bettini R . Malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour: lymph node ratio and Ki67 are predictors of recurrence after curative resections. Eur J Cancer. 2011; 48(11):1608-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.10.030. View

5.
Frilling A, Modlin I, Kidd M, Russell C, Breitenstein S, Salem R . Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(1):e8-21. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70362-0. View