» Articles » PMID: 24492637

Unidirectional Hybridization and Reproductive Barriers Between Two Heterostylous Primrose Species in North-west Yunnan, China

Overview
Journal Ann Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2014 Feb 5
PMID 24492637
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Heteromorphy in flowers has a profound effect on breeding patterns within a species, but little is known about how it affects reproductive barriers between species. The heterostylous genus Primula is very diverse in the Himalaya region, but hybrids there have been little researched. This study examines in detail a natural hybrid zone between P. beesiana and P. bulleyana.

Methods: Chloroplast sequencing, AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers and morphological comparisons were employed to characterize putative hybrids in the field, using synthetic F1s from hand pollination as controls. Pollinator visits to parent species and hybrids were observed in the field. Hand pollinations were conducted to compare pollen tube growth, seed production and seed viability for crosses involving different morphs, species and directions of crossing.

Key Results: Molecular data revealed all hybrid derivatives examined to be backcrosses of first or later generations towards P. bulleyana: all had the chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) of this species. Some individuals had morphological traits suggesting they were hybrids, but they were genetically similar to P. bulleyana; they might have been advanced generation backcrosses. Viable F1s could not be produced with P. bulleyana pollen on P. beesiana females, irrespective of the flower morphs used. Within-morph crosses for each species had very low (<10 %) seed viability, whereas crosses between pin P. bulleyana (female) and pin P. beesiana had a higher seed viability of 30 %. Thus genetic incompatibility mechanisms back up mechanical barriers to within-morph crosses in each species, but are not the same between the two species. The two species share their main pollinators, and pollinators were observed to fly between P. bulleyana and hybrids, suggesting that pollinator behaviour may not be an important isolating factor.

Conclusions: Hybridization is strongly asymmetric, with P. bulleyana the only possible mother and all detected hybrids being backcrosses in this direction. Partial ecological isolation and inhibition of heterospecific pollen, and possibly complete barriers to F1 formation on P. beesiana, may be enough to make F1 formation very rare in these species. Therefore, with no F1 detected, this hybrid zone may have a finite life span as successive generations become more similar to P. bulleyana.

Citing Articles

Genetic Diversity and Subspecific Races of Upland Cotton ( L.).

Safiullina A, Ernazarova D, Turaev O, Rafieva F, Ernazarova Z, Arslanova S Genes (Basel). 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39766800 PMC: 11675639. DOI: 10.3390/genes15121533.


Horticultural applications of natural hybrids as an accelerating way for breeding woody ornamental plants.

Tian X, Ma Y Front Genet. 2022; 13:1047100.

PMID: 36437930 PMC: 9681998. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1047100.


Unusual patterns of hybridization involving two alpine species: Absence of both F and backcrossed hybrids.

Chang Y, Zhao S, Xiao H, Liu D, Huang Y, Wei Y Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1010577.

PMID: 36330249 PMC: 9623266. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1010577.


Over 30 Years of Misidentification: A New Nothospecies × (Amaryllidaceae) in Eastern China, Based on Molecular, Morphological, and Karyotypic Evidence.

Zhang S, Hu Y, Wang H, Zhang P, Shao J Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(13).

PMID: 35807681 PMC: 9269102. DOI: 10.3390/plants11131730.


Natural hybridization between two butterfly bushes in Tibet: dominance of F hybrids promotes strong reproductive isolation.

Liao R, Sun W, Ma Y BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21(1):133.

PMID: 33691631 PMC: 7945306. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-02909-7.


References
1.
Natalis L, Wesselingh R . Parental frequencies and spatial configuration shape bumblebee behavior and floral isolation in hybridizing Rhinanthus. Evolution. 2013; 67(6):1692-705. DOI: 10.1111/evo.12044. View

2.
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J . Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14(8):2611-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x. View

3.
Broyles S . Hybrid bridges to gene flow: a case study in milkweeds (Asclepias). Evolution. 2002; 56(10):1943-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00120.x. View

4.
Chung M, Nason J, Chung M . Patterns of hybridization and population genetic structure in the terrestrial orchids Liparis kumokiri and Liparis makinoana (Orchidaceae) in sympatric populations. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14(14):4389-402. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02738.x. View

5.
Hubisz M, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard J . Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011; 9(5):1322-32. PMC: 3518025. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x. View