» Articles » PMID: 24491297

In Vitro Screening of Embryos by Whole-genome Sequencing: Now, in the Future or Never?

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2014 Feb 5
PMID 24491297
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Question: What are the analytical and clinical validity and the clinical utility of in vitro screening of embryos by whole-genome sequencing?

Summary Answer: At present there are still many limitations in terms of analytical and clinical validity and utility and many ethical questions remain.

What Is Known Already: Whole-genome sequencing of IVF/ICSI embryos is technically possible. Many loss-of-function mutations exist in the general population without serious effects on the phenotype of the individual. Moreover, annotations of genes and the reference genome are still not 100% correct.

Study Design, Size, Duration: We used publicly available samples from the 1000 Genomes project and Complete Genomics, together with 42 samples from in-house research samples of parents from trios to investigate the presence of loss-of-function mutations in healthy individuals.

Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: In the samples, we looked for mutations in genes that are associated with a selection of severe Mendelian disorders with a known molecular basis. We looked for mutations predicted to be damaging by PolyPhen and SIFT and for mutations annotated as disease causing in Human Genome Mutation Database (HGMD).

Main Results And The Role Of Chance: More than 40% of individuals who can be considered healthy have mutations that are predicted to be damaging in genes associated with severe Mendelian disorders or are annotated as disease causing.

Limitations, Reasons For Caution: The analysis relies on current knowledge and databases are continuously updated to reflect our increasing knowledge about the genome. In the process of our analysis several updates were already made.

Wider Implications Of The Findings: At this moment it is not advisable to use whole-genome sequencing as a tool to set up health profiles to select embryos for transfer. We also raise some ethical questions that have to be addressed before this technology can be used for embryo selection.

Trial Registration Number: N/A.

Citing Articles

Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).

Alon I, Bussod I, Ravitsky V J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(5):1153-1171.

PMID: 38512655 PMC: 11143109. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03076-y.


Acceptance of genetic editing and of whole genome sequencing of human embryos by patients with infertility before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Neuhausser W, Fouks Y, Lee S, Macharia A, Hyun I, Adashi E Reprod Biomed Online. 2023; 47(1):157-163.

PMID: 37127437 PMC: 10330010. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.03.013.


Genome sequencing of human in vitro fertilisation embryos for pathogenic variation screening.

Murphy N, Samarasekera T, Macaskill L, Mullen J, Rombauts L Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):3795.

PMID: 32123222 PMC: 7052235. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60704-0.


Mir-661: A key Factor in Embryo-Maternal dialog With Potential Clinical Application to Predict Implantation Outcome?.

Cano A, Gomez R EBioMedicine. 2015; 2(10):1312-3.

PMID: 26629524 PMC: 4634840. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.09.043.


Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers.

Gingold J, Lee J, Rodriguez-Purata J, Whitehouse M, Sandler B, Grunfeld L Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(3):620-8.e5.

PMID: 26079695 PMC: 4561002. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.036.