» Articles » PMID: 24487626

Quantification of Continuous in Vivo Flexion-extension Kinematics and Intervertebral Strains

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Feb 4
PMID 24487626
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Healthy subjects performed lumbar flexion and were assessed by video fluoroscopy to measure the in vivo kinematics of the lower lumbar motion segments.

Methods: Fifteen healthy subjects (8 male, 7 female, 28 ± 10 years) performed lumbar flexion and extension back to neutral while their vertebrae were imaged. The sagittal plane vertebral margins of L3-S1 were identified. Lumbar angle, segmental margin strains, axial displacements, anterior-posterior (A-P) translations, and segmental rotations over the course of flexion were measured.

Results: L4-L5 had the largest posterior margin Green strain (65%). Each segment displayed more axial displacement than A-P translation. Peak vertebral angulation occurred at approximately 75% of peak flexion during the extension phase.

Conclusion: L4-L5 exhibited the largest anterior and posterior margin strains (29 and 65%, respectively). Strains in the disc during in vivo lumbar flexion are due to both angular rotation and linear translation.

Citing Articles

A Reference Database of Standardised Continuous Lumbar Intervertebral Motion Analysis for Conducting Patient-Specific Comparisons.

Breen A, De Carvalho D, Funabashi M, Kawchuk G, Page I, Wong A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:745837.

PMID: 34646820 PMC: 8503612. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.745837.


A Dynamic Optimization Approach for Solving Spine Kinematics While Calibrating Subject-Specific Mechanical Properties.

Wang W, Wang D, Falisse A, Severijns P, Overbergh T, Moke L Ann Biomed Eng. 2021; 49(9):2311-2322.

PMID: 33851322 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02774-3.


Comparison of biomechanical studies of disc repair devices based on a systematic review.

Virk S, Chen T, Meyers K, Lafage V, Schwab F, Maher S Spine J. 2020; 20(8):1344-1355.

PMID: 32092506 PMC: 9063717. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.02.007.


Computer simulation of lumbar flexion shows shear of the facet capsular ligament.

Claeson A, Barocas V Spine J. 2016; 17(1):109-119.

PMID: 27520078 PMC: 5164854. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.014.


Design Requirements for Annulus Fibrosus Repair: Review of Forces, Displacements, and Material Properties of the Intervertebral Disk and a Summary of Candidate Hydrogels for Repair.

Long R, Torre O, Hom W, Assael D, Iatridis J J Biomech Eng. 2016; 138(2):021007.

PMID: 26720265 PMC: 4844119. DOI: 10.1115/1.4032353.


References
1.
Teyhen D, Flynn T, Childs J, Kuklo T, Rosner M, Polly D . Fluoroscopic video to identify aberrant lumbar motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(7):E220-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259206.38946.cb. View

2.
Stokes I . Surface strain on human intervertebral discs. J Orthop Res. 1987; 5(3):348-55. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100050306. View

3.
Nachemson A, Schultz A, Berkson M . Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments. Influence of age, sex, disc level, and degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1979; 4(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-197901000-00001. View

4.
Pearcy M, Tibrewal S . Lumbar intervertebral disc and ligament deformations measured in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (191):281-6. View

5.
Takayanagi K, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Moriya H, Kitahara H, Tamaki T . Using cineradiography for continuous dynamic-motion analysis of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(17):1858-65. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00008. View