» Articles » PMID: 24475843

Digital Mammography Screening: Association Between Detection Rate and Nuclear Grade of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Jan 31
PMID 24475843
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the relationship between overall detection rates of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and the specific detection rates of low-, intermediate-, and high-grade DCIS at the start of a digital mammography screening program.

Materials And Methods: The study was approved by the local ethics board and did not require informed consent. Data were included of the first round of digital mammography examinations, performed in 17 screening units in women aged 50-69 years from 2005 to 2008. Grading was provided by the cancer registry for 1018 DCIS cases. The association between the overall cancer detection rate (cases per 100 women screened) and the separate cancer detection rate for invasive cancers and for DCIS was assessed. Likewise, the total DCIS cancer detection rate was separated into rates for low, intermediate, and high grades. Spearman rank correlations were used for analysis.

Results: The overall cancer detection rate correlated with both the cancer detection rate of invasive cancers and the cancer detection rate of DCIS (r = 0.96 and r = 0.88, respectively; P < .001 for both). The cancer detection rate of total DCIS with grading varied among screening units (range, 0.05-0.25), it was borderline not significantly correlated with the cancer detection rate of low-grade DCIS (range, 0.004-0.05; r = 0.49; P = .052), and it showed significant correlations with higher cancer detection rate of intermediate-grade DCIS (range, 0.02-0.12; r = 0.89; P < .001) and of high-grade DCIS (range, 0.03-0.11; r = 0.88; P < .001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that high overall cancer detection rates in digital mammography screening are related to high detection rates of invasive cancers, as well as DCIS. Increases in the detection rates of DCIS were not driven by disproportionate increments of the slowly progressive low-grade subtype but rather by increased rates of intermediate- and high-grade subtypes that carry a higher risk of transition to invasive cancers.

Citing Articles

Incidence trends of ductal carcinoma in situ in New Zealand women between 1999 and 2022.

Chen Q, Elwood M, Campbell I, Cavadino A, Aye P, Tin Tin S Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025; .

PMID: 39856462 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07582-6.


Development and quality appraisal of a new English breast screening linked data set as part of the age, test threshold, and frequency of mammography screening (ATHENA-M) study.

Brettschneider J, Morrison B, Jenkinson D, Freeman K, Walton J, Sitch A Br J Radiol. 2024; 97(1153):98-112.

PMID: 38263823 PMC: 11027252. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad023.


Successes and challenges in extracting information from DICOM image databases for audit and research.

Mackenzie A, Lewis E, Loveland J Br J Radiol. 2023; 96(1151):20230104.

PMID: 37698251 PMC: 10607388. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230104.


Using deep learning to assist readers during the arbitration process: a lesion-based retrospective evaluation of breast cancer screening performance.

Kerschke L, Weigel S, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Karssemeijer N, Heindel W Eur Radiol. 2021; 32(2):842-852.

PMID: 34383147 PMC: 8794989. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08217-w.


Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives.

Lee S, Kim H, Yoon J, Kim E, Kim J, Kim M Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28(13):8699-8709.

PMID: 34196861 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10378-3.