» Articles » PMID: 24475840

Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Bevacizumab: Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Subtraction Maps Improve Tumor Delineation and Aid Prediction of Survival in a Multicenter Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Jan 31
PMID 24475840
Citations 133
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the capability to aid prediction of clinical outcome measures, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), between volumetric estimates from contrast material-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted subtraction maps and traditional segmentation in a randomized multicenter clinical trial of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients treated with bevacizumab.

Materials And Methods: All patients participating in this study signed institutional review board-approved informed consent at their respective institutions prior to enrolling in the multicenter clinical trial. One-hundred sixty patients with recurrent GBM enrolled as part of a HIPAA-compliant, multicenter clinical trial (AVF3708 g, BRAIN trial). Contrast-enhancing tumor volumes and change in volumes as a response to therapy were quantified by using either conventional segmentation or CE T1-weighted subtraction maps created by voxel-by-voxel subtraction of intensity-normalized nonenhanced T1-weighted images from CE T1-weighted images. These volumes were then tested as predictors of PFS and OS by using log-rank univariate analysis, the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: Use of CE T1-weighted subtraction maps qualitatively improved visualization and improved quantification of tumor volume after bevacizumab treatment. Significant trends between the volume of tumor and change in tumor volume after therapy on CE T1-weighted subtraction maps were found for both PFS and OS (pretreatment volume < 15 cm(3), P < .003; posttreatment volume < 7.5 cm(3), P < .05; percentage change in volume > 25%, P = .004 for PFS and P = .053 for OS). CE T1-weighted subtraction maps were significantly better at aiding prediction of 6-month PFS and 12-month OS compared with conventional segmentation by using receiver operating characteristic analysis (P < .05).

Conclusion: Use of CE T1-weighted subtraction maps improved visualization and aided better prediction of patient survival in recurrent GBM treated with bevacizumab compared with conventional segmentation of CE T1-weighted images. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00345163. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Citing Articles

Magnetic resonance imaging and o-(2-[F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine positron emission tomography for early response assessment of nivolumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytic glioma.

Henriksen O, Maarup S, Hasselbalch B, Poulsen H, Christensen I, Madsen K Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae178.

PMID: 39659835 PMC: 11630048. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae178.


The QIBA Profile for Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Assessing Gliomas.

Shiroishi M, Erickson B, Hu L, Barboriak D, Becerra L, Bell L Radiology. 2024; 313(3):e232555.

PMID: 39656118 PMC: 11694077. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232555.


Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: a pattern of care analysis.

Rogers S, Gross M, Ermis E, Cosgun G, Baumert B, Mader T BMC Neurol. 2024; 24(1):462.

PMID: 39587462 PMC: 11590342. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03954-z.


Visualizing the association between the location and prognosis of isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma: a voxel-wise Cox regression analysis with open-source datasets.

Atsukawa N, Tatekawa H, Ueda D, Oura T, Matsushita S, Horiuchi D Neuroradiology. 2024; .

PMID: 39542911 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03503-y.


Radio-pathomic estimates of cellular growth kinetics predict survival in recurrent glioblastoma.

Oshima S, Yao J, Bobholz S, Nagaraj R, Raymond C, Teraishi A CNS Oncol. 2024; 13(1):2415285.

PMID: 39535237 PMC: 11562955. DOI: 10.1080/20450907.2024.2415285.


References
1.
Nalluri S, Chu D, Keresztes R, Zhu X, Wu S . Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008; 300(19):2277-85. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.656. View

2.
Friedman H, Prados M, Wen P, Mikkelsen T, Schiff D, Abrey L . Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(28):4733-40. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8721. View

3.
Vredenburgh J, Desjardins A, Herndon 2nd J, Marcello J, Reardon D, Quinn J . Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(30):4722-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2440. View

4.
Harrington D, Boxt L, Murray P . Digital subtraction angiography: overview of technical principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982; 139(4):781-6. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.139.4.781. View

5.
An C, Park M, Kim D, Kim Y, Chung W, Rhee H . Added value of subtraction imaging in detecting arterial enhancement in small (<3 cm) hepatic nodules on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(4):924-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2685-x. View