Regional Brain Changes Occurring During Disobedience to "experts" in Financial Decision-making

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2014 Jan 30

PMID 24475270

Citations 6

Authors

Victoria Y M Suen

Matthew R G Brown

Randall K Morck

Peter H Silverstone

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

It is well recognized that individuals follow "Expert" advice, even when flawed and offers no advantage, and sometimes leads to disadvantages. The neurobiology underlying this is uncertain, and in particular there is an incomplete understanding of which brain regions are most involved when individuals chose to disobey an expert. To study this we examined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) differences during an investment game where subjects received differentially credible investment advice. Participants (n = 42; 32 males) played an investment game, in which they could Buy or Not Buy a sequence of stocks. The better they did, the more money they made. Participants received either "Expert" advice or "Peer" advice. Those receiving Expert advice were told the advice came from a certified financial "Expert". Those receiving Peer Advice were told the advice was that of the student administering the scans, who deliberately dressed and acted casually. Both streams of advice were predetermined and identical. The advice was scripted to be helpful initially, but progressively worse as the task continued, becoming 100% wrong by the end of the task. Subjects receiving Expert Advice followed the advice significantly longer on average, even though this was progressively worse advice. Thus, following Expert advice had poorer consequences for individuals, but this did not dissuade them from continuing to follow the advice. In contrast, when subjects disobeyed Expert advice they exhibited significant anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and superior frontal gyrus activation relative to those disobeying Peer advice. These findings may suggest that in subjects who defy authority, or believe they are doing so (in this case by disobeying an "Expert") there is increased activation of these two brain regions. This may have relevance to several areas of behavior, and the potential role of these two brain regions in regard to disobedience behavior requires further study.

Citing Articles

Mapping the knowledge domain of financial decision making: A scientometric and bibliometric study.

Guo L, Cheng J, Zhang Z Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1006412.

PMID: 36337546 PMC: 9627155. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006412.

Oxytocin Facilitates Social Learning by Promoting Conformity to Trusted Individuals.

Xu L, Becker B, Kendrick K Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:56.

PMID: 30787864 PMC: 6372972. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00056.

Frontal cortex electrophysiology in reward- and punishment-related feedback processing during advice-guided decision making: An interleaved EEG-DC stimulation study.

Wischnewski M, Bekkering H, Schutter D Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018; 18(2):249-262.

PMID: 29380293 PMC: 5889418. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0566-8.

Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study.

Goodyear K, Parasuraman R, Chernyak S, Madhavan P, Deshpande G, Krueger F Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:542.

PMID: 27867351 PMC: 5095979. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00542.

Standing in Your Peer's Shoes Hurts Your Feats: The Self-Others Discrepancy in Risk Attitude and Impulsivity.

Bialaszek W, Bakun P, McGoun E, Zielonka P Front Psychol. 2016; 7:197.

PMID: 26925015 PMC: 4759252. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00197.

References

Burgdorf J, Panksepp J . The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005; 30(2):173-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001. View

Elliott R, Dolan R . Activation of different anterior cingulate foci in association with hypothesis testing and response selection. Neuroimage. 1998; 8(1):17-29. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0344. View

Paulus M, Feinstein J, Leland D, Simmons A . Superior temporal gyrus and insula provide response and outcome-dependent information during assessment and action selection in a decision-making situation. Neuroimage. 2005; 25(2):607-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.055. View

Rosenbloom M, Schmahmann J, Price B . The functional neuroanatomy of decision-making. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012; 24(3):266-77. DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.11060139. View

Critchley H, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Ohman A, Dolan R . Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(2):189-95. DOI: 10.1038/nn1176. View

Johnson S, Baxter L, Wilder L, Pipe J, Heiserman J, Prigatano G . Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 8):1808-14. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf181. View

Clark L, Bechara A, Damasio H, Aitken M, Sahakian B, Robbins T . Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making. Brain. 2008; 131(Pt 5):1311-22. PMC: 2367692. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn066. View

Forbes E, May J, Siegle G, Ladouceur C, Ryan N, Carter C . Reward-related decision-making in pediatric major depressive disorder: an fMRI study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006; 47(10):1031-40. PMC: 2129133. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01673.x. View

Carter C, Braver T, Barch D, Botvinick M, Noll D, Cohen J . Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science. 1998; 280(5364):747-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5364.747. View

10.

Stoodley C, Schmahmann J . Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(2):489-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039. View

11.

Schmahmann J, Pandya D . Disconnection syndromes of basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebrocerebellar systems. Cortex. 2008; 44(8):1037-66. PMC: 3738020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.004. View

12.

Krawczyk D . Contributions of the prefrontal cortex to the neural basis of human decision making. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002; 26(6):631-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00021-0. View

13.

Bush , Luu , Posner . Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(6):215-222. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01483-2. View

14.

Ernst M, Bolla K, Mouratidis M, Contoreggi C, Matochik J, Kurian V . Decision-making in a risk-taking task: a PET study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002; 26(5):682-91. DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00414-6. View

15.

Hsu M, Bhatt M, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Camerer C . Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science. 2005; 310(5754):1680-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1115327. View

16.

McClure S, York M, Montague P . The neural substrates of reward processing in humans: the modern role of FMRI. Neuroscientist. 2004; 10(3):260-8. DOI: 10.1177/1073858404263526. View

17.

Andreasen N, OLeary D, Cizadlo T, Arndt S, Rezai K, WATKINS G . Remembering the past: two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography. Am J Psychiatry. 1995; 152(11):1576-85. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.152.11.1576. View

18.

Kim K, Karunanayaka P, Privitera M, Holland S, Szaflarski J . Semantic association investigated with functional MRI and independent component analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2011; 20(4):613-22. PMC: 3078943. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.11.010. View

19.

Ramnani N, Owen A . Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5(3):184-94. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1343. View

20.

Brown M, Lebel R, Dolcos F, Wilman A, Silverstone P, Pazderka H . Effects of emotional context on impulse control. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(1):434-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.056. View