» Articles » PMID: 24474162

Exhaustive Docking and Solvated Interaction Energy Scoring: Lessons Learned from the SAMPL4 Challenge

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Jan 30
PMID 24474162
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We continued prospective assessments of the Wilma-solvated interaction energy (SIE) platform for pose prediction, binding affinity prediction, and virtual screening on the challenging SAMPL4 data sets including the HIV-integrase inhibitor and two host-guest systems. New features of the docking algorithm and scoring function are tested here prospectively for the first time. Wilma-SIE provides good correlations with actual binding affinities over a wide range of binding affinities that includes strong binders as in the case of SAMPL4 host-guest systems. Absolute binding affinities are also reproduced with appropriate training of the scoring function on available data sets or from comparative estimation of the change in target's vibrational entropy. Even when binding modes are known, SIE predictions lack correlation with experimental affinities within dynamic ranges below 2 kcal/mol as in the case of HIV-integrase ligands, but they correctly signaled the narrowness of the dynamic range. Using a common protein structure for all ligands can reduce the noise, while incorporating a more sophisticated solvation treatment improves absolute predictions. The HIV-integrase virtual screening data set consists of promiscuous weak binders with relatively high flexibility and thus it falls outside of the applicability domain of the Wilma-SIE docking platform. Despite these difficulties, unbiased docking around three known binding sites of the enzyme resulted in over a third of ligands being docked within 2 Å from their actual poses and over half of the ligands docked in the correct site, leading to better-than-random virtual screening results.

Citing Articles

Improved Structure-Based Histidine p Prediction for pH-Responsive Protein Design.

Hogues H, Wei W, Sulea T J Chem Inf Model. 2025; 65(3):1560-1569.

PMID: 39826152 PMC: 11815838. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01957.


Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Lipid Nanoparticles Encapsulating mRNA.

Zhang Z, Cheng D, Luo W, Hu D, Yang T, Hu K Molecules. 2024; 29(18).

PMID: 39339404 PMC: 11433737. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29184409.


Exploring rigid-backbone protein docking in biologics discovery: a test using the DARPin scaffold.

Gaudreault F, Baardsnes J, Martynova Y, Dachon A, Hogues H, Corbeil C Front Mol Biosci. 2023; 10:1253689.

PMID: 37692063 PMC: 10484509. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1253689.


Solvated interaction energy: from small-molecule to antibody drug design.

Purisima E, Corbeil C, Gaudreault F, Wei W, Deprez C, Sulea T Front Mol Biosci. 2023; 10:1210576.

PMID: 37351549 PMC: 10282643. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1210576.


Sunsetting Binding MOAD with its last data update and the addition of 3D-ligand polypharmacology tools.

Wagle S, Smith R, Dominic 3rd A, Dasgupta D, Tripathi S, Carlson H Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3008.

PMID: 36810894 PMC: 9944886. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29996-w.


References
1.
Gohlke H, Case D . Converging free energy estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA studies on the protein-protein complex Ras-Raf. J Comput Chem. 2003; 25(2):238-50. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10379. View

2.
Cui Q, Sulea T, Schrag J, Munger C, Hung M, Naim M . Molecular dynamics-solvated interaction energy studies of protein-protein interactions: the MP1-p14 scaffolding complex. J Mol Biol. 2008; 379(4):787-802. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.035. View

3.
Muddana H, Fenley A, Mobley D, Gilson M . The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2014; 28(4):305-17. PMC: 4053502. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9735-1. View

4.
Englebienne P, Moitessier N . Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 4. Are popular scoring functions accurate for this class of proteins?. J Chem Inf Model. 2009; 49(6):1568-80. DOI: 10.1021/ci8004308. View

5.
Moghaddam S, Yang C, Rekharsky M, Ko Y, Kim K, Inoue Y . New ultrahigh affinity host-guest complexes of cucurbit[7]uril with bicyclo[2.2.2]octane and adamantane guests: thermodynamic analysis and evaluation of M2 affinity calculations. J Am Chem Soc. 2011; 133(10):3570-81. PMC: 3065999. DOI: 10.1021/ja109904u. View