» Articles » PMID: 24469322

The Covariates of Parent and Youth Reporting Differences on Youth Secondary Exposure to Community Violence

Overview
Journal J Youth Adolesc
Date 2014 Jan 29
PMID 24469322
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Survey data for studying youth's secondary exposure to community violence (i.e., witnessing or hearing violence in the community) come from both parents and their children. There are benefits of considering multiple informants in psychosocial assessments, but parents and youths often disagree about comparable information. These reporting differences present challenges for both researchers and clinicians. To shed new light on the individual, family, and neighborhood factors that contribute to parent and youth reporting differences regarding youth's secondary exposure to community violence, this study analyzed hierarchical item response models on a sample of youth respondents from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods. Participants were aged approximately 9, 12, and 15 years (trimodal distribution; mean age = 12.0 years) at baseline (N = 2,344; 49.6% female). Descriptive analyses indicated that parents significantly underestimated their children's exposure to community violence. Logistic hierarchical item response models indicated that absolute discrepancies between parent and youth reports were a function of youth demographic characteristics (male, Hispanic or African American as compared to white, age, 3rd as compared to 1st generation immigrant), individual difference factors (lower levels of self-control, higher levels of violent peer exposure), and family factors (lower household socioeconomic status). Parental under-reporting of youth's exposure to violence was associated with youth demographic characteristics (male, age, 2nd as compared to 3rd generation immigrant), family factors (lower levels of parental supervision), and neighborhood characteristics (higher levels of violence, less access to youth services). The results suggest that a constellation of individual and contextual factors may contribute to the understanding of parent and youth reporting differences. The findings speak to the utility of examining parent and youth reporting differences from a hierarchical lens.

Citing Articles

Chicago Youths' Exposure to Community Violence: Contextualizing Spatial Dynamics of Violence and the Relationship With Psychological Functioning.

DaViera A, Roy A Am J Community Psychol. 2019; 65(3-4):332-342.

PMID: 31792990 PMC: 8006467. DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12405.


Experiences of intimate partner violence as perpetrated among Japanese university freshmen.

Shozaki-Ito H, Shibayama T, Matsuyama Y, Ohnishi M J Rural Med. 2018; 13(1):33-39.

PMID: 29875895 PMC: 5981017. DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2948.

References
1.
Gardner M, Brooks-Gunn J . ADOLESCENTS' EXPOSURE TO COMMUNITY VIOLENCE: ARE NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ORGANIZATIONS PROTECTIVE?. J Community Psychol. 2011; 37(4):505-525. PMC: 3110745. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.20310. View

2.
Gorman-Smith D, Henry D, Tolan P . Exposure to community violence and violence perpetration: the protective effects of family functioning. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2004; 33(3):439-49. DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3303_2. View

3.
Stein B, Jaycox L, Kataoka S, Rhodes H, Vestal K . Prevalence of child and adolescent exposure to community violence. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2004; 6(4):247-64. DOI: 10.1023/b:ccfp.0000006292.61072.d2. View

4.
Andrews V, Garrison C, Jackson K, Addy C, McKeown R . Mother-adolescent agreement on the symptoms and diagnoses of adolescent depression and conduct disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993; 32(4):731-8. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199307000-00005. View

5.
Achenbach T, McConaughy S, Howell C . Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull. 1987; 101(2):213-32. View