» Articles » PMID: 24465807

Host-specificity and Dynamics in Bacterial Communities Associated with Bloom-forming Freshwater Phytoplankton

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Jan 28
PMID 24465807
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many freshwater phytoplankton species have the potential to form transient nuisance blooms that affect water quality and other aquatic biota. Heterotrophic bacteria can influence such blooms via nutrient regeneration but also via antagonism and other biotic interactions. We studied the composition of bacterial communities associated with three bloom-forming freshwater phytoplankton species, the diatom Aulacoseira granulata and the cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii. Experimental cultures incubated with and without lake bacteria were sampled in three different growth phases and bacterial community composition was assessed by 454-Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Betaproteobacteria were dominant in all cultures inoculated with lake bacteria, but decreased during the experiment. In contrast, Alphaproteobacteria, which made up the second most abundant class of bacteria, increased overall during the course of the experiment. Other bacterial classes responded in contrasting ways to the experimental incubations causing significantly different bacterial communities to develop in response to host phytoplankton species, growth phase and between attached and free-living fractions. Differences in bacterial community composition between cyanobacteria and diatom cultures were greater than between the two cyanobacteria. Despite the significance, major differences between phytoplankton cultures were in the proportion of the OTUs rather than in the absence or presence of specific taxa. Different phytoplankton species favoring different bacterial communities may have important consequences for the fate of organic matter in systems where these bloom forming species occur. The dynamics and development of transient blooms may also be affected as bacterial communities seem to influence phytoplankton species growth in contrasting ways.

Citing Articles

Diversity and networking of uni-cyanobacterial cultures and associated heterotrophic bacteria from the benthic microbial mat of a desert hydrothermal spring.

Lassoued K, Mahjoubi M, Asimakis E, Bel Mokhtar N, Stathopoulou P, Ben Hamouda R FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024; 100(12).

PMID: 39557663 PMC: 11650863. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiae148.


Diverse interactions between bacteria and microalgae: A review for enhancing harmful algal bloom mitigation and biomass processing efficiency.

Abate R, Oon Y, Oon Y, Bi Y, Mi W, Song G Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e36503.

PMID: 39286093 PMC: 11402748. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36503.


Cross-domain diversity effects: linking diatom species richness, intraspecific richness, and biomass production to host-associated bacterial diversity.

Jacob M, Thomas P, Giebel H, Billerbeck S, Simon M, Striebel M ISME Commun. 2024; 4(1):ycae046.

PMID: 39165397 PMC: 11334582. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae046.


Beyond the Bloom: Unraveling the Diversity, Overlap, and Stability of Free-Living and Particle-Attached Bacterial Communities in a Cyanobacteria-Dominated Hypereutrophic Lake.

Xie G, Sun C, Gong Y, Luo W, Tang X Microb Ecol. 2024; 87(1):96.

PMID: 39046558 PMC: 11269507. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-024-02410-2.


Distinct ecological niches and community dynamics: understanding free-living and particle-attached bacterial communities in an oligotrophic deep lake.

Xie G, Sun C, Luo W, Gong Y, Tang X Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(7):e0071424.

PMID: 38940583 PMC: 11267872. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00714-24.


References
1.
Grossart H, Levold F, Allgaier M, Simon M, Brinkhoff T . Marine diatom species harbour distinct bacterial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2005; 7(6):860-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00759.x. View

2.
Pope P, Patel B . Metagenomic analysis of a freshwater toxic cyanobacteria bloom. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008; 64(1):9-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00448.x. View

3.
Sher D, Thompson J, Kashtan N, Croal L, Chisholm S . Response of Prochlorococcus ecotypes to co-culture with diverse marine bacteria. ISME J. 2011; 5(7):1125-32. PMC: 3146288. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.1. View

4.
Wolda H . Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia. 2017; 50(3):296-302. DOI: 10.1007/BF00344966. View

5.
Wang Q, Garrity G, Tiedje J, Cole J . Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(16):5261-7. PMC: 1950982. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. View