» Articles » PMID: 24465454

Factors Affecting De Novo Urinary Retention After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Jan 28
PMID 24465454
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Patients can experience urinary retention (UR) after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) that requires bladder distension during the procedure. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify factors affecting the UR after HoLEP.

Materials And Methods: 336 patients, which underwent HoLEP for a symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia between July 2008 and March 2012, were included in this study. Urethral catheters were routinely removed one or two days after surgery. UR was defined as the need for an indwelling catheter placement following a failure to void after catheter removal. Demographic and clinical parameters were compared between the UR (n = 37) and the non-urinary retention (non-UR; n = 299) groups.

Results: The mean age of patients was 68.3 (±6.5) years and the mean operative time was 75.3 (±37.4) min. Thirty seven patients (11.0%) experienced a postoperative UR. UR patients voided catheter free an average of 1.9 (±1.7) days after UR. With regard to the causes of UR, 24 (7.1%) and 13 (3.9%) patients experienced a blood clot-related UR and a non-clot related UR respectively. Using multivariate analysis (p<0.05), we found significant differences between the UR and the non-UR groups with regard to a morcellation efficiency (OR 0.701, 95% CI 0.498-0.988) and a bleeding-related complication, such as, a reoperation for bleeding (OR 0.039, 95% CI 0.004-0.383) or a transfusion (OR 0.144, 95% CI 0.027-0.877). Age, history of diabetes, prostate volume, pre-operative post-void residual, bladder contractility index, learning curve, and operative time were not significantly associated with the UR (p>0.05).

Conclusions: De novo UR after HoLEP was found to be self-limited and it was not related to learning curve, patient age, diabetes, or operative time. Efficient morcellation and careful control of bleeding, which reduces clot formation, decrease the risk of UR after HoLEP.

Citing Articles

Analysis of urinary retention after endoscopic prostate enucleation and its subsequent impact on surgical outcomes.

Hsu Y, Hou C, Weng S, Tsai H, Tsao S, Juang H World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):305.

PMID: 38724829 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04918-1.


Ambulatory surgery for Moses™ holmium laser enucleation of the prostate A prospective, real-practice study from a single center.

Morin A, Boulet S, Lagabrielle S Can Urol Assoc J. 2023; 17(8):E228-E235.

PMID: 37581561 PMC: 10426413. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8229.


Predictors of early catheter replacement after HoLEP. Results from a high-volume laser center.

Di Maida F, Cadenar A, Grosso A, Lambertini L, Giudici S, Paganelli D Int Braz J Urol. 2023; 49(5):608-618.

PMID: 37506034 PMC: 10482466. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0165.


Predictors of readmission and impact of same-day discharge in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Riveros C, Di Valerio E, Bacchus M, Chalfant V, Leelani N, Thomas D Prostate Int. 2023; 11(1):20-26.

PMID: 36910904 PMC: 9995658. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.003.


Incidence and risk factors for postoperative urinary incontinence after various prostate enucleation procedures: systemic review and meta-analysis of PubMed literature from 2000 to 2021.

Hout M, Gurayah A, Suarez Arbelaez M, Blachman-Braun R, Shah K, Herrmann T World J Urol. 2022; 40(11):2731-2745.

PMID: 36194286 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04174-1.


References
1.
Hettiarachchi J, Samadi A, Konno S, Das A . Holmium laser enucleation for large (greater than 100 mL) prostate glands. Int J Urol. 2002; 9(5):233-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00457.x. View

2.
Gilling P, Cass C, Malcolm A, Fraundorfer M . Combination holmium and Nd:YAG laser ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience. J Endourol. 1995; 9(2):151-3. DOI: 10.1089/end.1995.9.151. View

3.
Rieken M, Ebinger Mundorff N, Bonkat G, Wyler S, Bachmann A . Complications of laser prostatectomy: a review of recent data. World J Urol. 2010; 28(1):53-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-009-0504-z. View

4.
Tan A, Liao C, Mo Z, Cao Y . Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction. Br J Surg. 2007; 94(10):1201-8. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5916. View

5.
Dubey D, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Srivastava A, Mandhani A . Acute urinary retention: defining the need and timing for pressure-flow studies. BJU Int. 2001; 88(3):178-82. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02273.x. View