The RSC Chromatin Remodeling Complex Has a Crucial Role in the Complete Remodeler Set for Yeast PHO5 Promoter Opening

Overview

Journal Nucleic Acids Res

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 2014 Jan 28

PMID 24465003

Citations 24

Authors

Sanja Musladin

Nils Krietenstein

Philipp Korber

Slobodan Barbaric

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although yeast PHO5 promoter chromatin opening is a founding model for chromatin remodeling, the complete set of involved remodelers remained unknown for a long time. The SWI/SNF and INO80 remodelers cooperate here, but nonessentially, and none of the many tested single or combined remodeler gene mutations could prevent PHO5 promoter opening. RSC, the most abundant and only remodeler essential for viability, was a controversial candidate for the unrecognized remodeling activity but unassessed in vivo. Now we show that remodels the structure of chromatin (RSC) is crucially involved in PHO5 promoter opening. Further, the isw1 chd1 double deletion also delayed chromatin remodeling. Strikingly, combined absence of RSC and Isw1/Chd1 or Snf2 abolished for the first time promoter opening on otherwise sufficient induction in vivo. Together with previous findings, we recognize now a surprisingly complex network of five remodelers (RSC, SWI/SNF, INO80, Isw1 and Chd1) from four subfamilies (SWI/SNF, INO80, ISWI and CHD) as involved in PHO5 promoter chromatin remodeling. This is likely the first described complete remodeler set for a physiological chromatin transition. RSC was hardly involved at the coregulated PHO8 or PHO84 promoters despite cofactor recruitment by the same transactivator and RSC's presence at all three promoters. Therefore, promoter-specific chromatin rather than transactivators determine remodeler requirements.

Citing Articles

Chromatin Remodeling Complex PBAF Activates and Represses Inflammatory Genes.

Feoktistov A, Georgieva S, Soshnikova N Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2023; 513(1):332-336.

PMID: 38066320 DOI: 10.1134/S1607672923700539.

Histone modification in : A review of the current status.

Chou K, Lee J, Kim K, Kim E, Lee H, Ryu H Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023; 21:1843-1850.

PMID: 36915383 PMC: 10006725. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.037.

Nucleosome Remodeling at the Yeast and Promoters without the Putatively Essential SWI/SNF Remodeler.

Lieleg C, Novacic A, Musladin S, Schmid A, Akpinar G, Barbaric S Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(5).

PMID: 36902382 PMC: 10003099. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054949.

Antisense non-coding transcription represses the PHO5 model gene at the level of promoter chromatin structure.

Novacic A, Menendez D, Ljubas J, Barbaric S, Stutz F, Soudet J PLoS Genet. 2022; 18(10):e1010432.

PMID: 36215302 PMC: 9584416. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010432.

Distinct functions of three chromatin remodelers in activator binding and preinitiation complex assembly.

Rawal Y, Qiu H, Hinnebusch A PLoS Genet. 2022; 18(7):e1010277.

PMID: 35793348 PMC: 9292117. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010277.

References

Dhasarathy A, Kladde M . Promoter occupancy is a major determinant of chromatin remodeling enzyme requirements. Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 25(7):2698-707. PMC: 1061642. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.7.2698-2707.2005. View

Gregory P, Horz W . Mapping chromatin structure in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1999; 304:365-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)04022-7. View

Gregory P, Barbaric S, Horz W . Restriction nucleases as probes for chromatin structure. Methods Mol Biol. 2000; 119:417-25. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-681-9:417. View

Ghaemmaghami S, Huh W, Bower K, Howson R, Belle A, Dephoure N . Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature. 2003; 425(6959):737-41. DOI: 10.1038/nature02046. View

Parnell T, Huff J, Cairns B . RSC regulates nucleosome positioning at Pol II genes and density at Pol III genes. EMBO J. 2007; 27(1):100-10. PMC: 2206128. DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601946. View

Korber P, Luckenbach T, Blaschke D, Horz W . Evidence for histone eviction in trans upon induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24(24):10965-74. PMC: 533982. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.24.10965-10974.2004. View

Partensky P, Narlikar G . Chromatin remodelers act globally, sequence positions nucleosomes locally. J Mol Biol. 2009; 391(1):12-25. PMC: 2813840. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.085. View

Flaus A, Martin D, Barton G, Owen-Hughes T . Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(10):2887-905. PMC: 1474054. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl295. View

Badis G, Chan E, van Bakel H, Pena-Castillo L, Tillo D, Tsui K . A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol Cell. 2008; 32(6):878-87. PMC: 2743730. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.020. View

10.

Carroll A, Bishop A, DeRisi J, Shokat K, OShea E . Chemical inhibition of the Pho85 cyclin-dependent kinase reveals a role in the environmental stress response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(22):12578-83. PMC: 60096. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.211195798. View

11.

Adkins M, Howar S, Tyler J . Chromatin disassembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 is essential for transcriptional activation of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes. Mol Cell. 2004; 14(5):657-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.016. View

12.

Korber P, Barbaric S, Luckenbach T, Schmid A, Schermer U, Blaschke D . The histone chaperone Asf1 increases the rate of histone eviction at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281(9):5539-45. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M513340200. View

13.

Thomas M, OShea E . An intracellular phosphate buffer filters transient fluctuations in extracellular phosphate levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(27):9565-70. PMC: 1157094. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501122102. View

14.

Lorch Y, Griesenbeck J, Boeger H, Maier-Davis B, Kornberg R . Selective removal of promoter nucleosomes by the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011; 18(8):881-5. PMC: 3150231. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2072. View

15.

Rudolph H, Hinnen A . The yeast PHO5 promoter: phosphate-control elements and sequences mediating mRNA start-site selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987; 84(5):1340-4. PMC: 304424. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1340. View

16.

Ogawa N, Saitoh H, Miura K, Magbanua J, Harashima S, Oshima Y . Structure and distribution of specific cis-elements for transcriptional regulation of PHO84 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1995; 249(4):406-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF00287102. View

17.

Boeger H, Griesenbeck J, Strattan J, Kornberg R . Removal of promoter nucleosomes by disassembly rather than sliding in vivo. Mol Cell. 2004; 14(5):667-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.013. View

18.

Fascher K, Schmitz J, Horz W . Structural and functional requirements for the chromatin transition at the PHO5 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae upon PHO5 activation. J Mol Biol. 1993; 231(3):658-67. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1317. View

19.

Tsuchiya E, Uno M, Kiguchi A, Masuoka K, Kanemori Y, Okabe S . The Saccharomyces cerevisiae NPS1 gene, a novel CDC gene which encodes a 160 kDa nuclear protein involved in G2 phase control. EMBO J. 1992; 11(11):4017-26. PMC: 556912. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05495.x. View

20.

Eisen J, Sweder K, HANAWALT P . Evolution of the SNF2 family of proteins: subfamilies with distinct sequences and functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23(14):2715-23. PMC: 307096. DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.14.2715. View