» Articles » PMID: 24454678

A Qualitative Exploration of Workarounds Related to the Implementation of National Electronic Health Records in Early Adopter Mental Health Hospitals

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Jan 24
PMID 24454678
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To investigate the perceptions and reported practices of mental health hospital staff using national hospital electronic health records (EHRs) in order to inform future implementations, particularly in acute mental health settings.

Methods: Thematic analysis of interviews with a wide range of clinical, information technology (IT), managerial and other staff at two early adopter mental health National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in London, UK, implementing national EHRs.

Results: We analysed 33 interviews. We first sought out examples of workarounds, such as delayed data entry, entering data in wrong places and individuals using the EHR while logged in as a colleague, then identified possible reasons for the reported workarounds. Our analysis identified four main categories of factors contributing to workarounds (i.e., operational, cultural, organisational and technical). Operational factors included poor system integration with existing workflows and the system not meeting users' perceived needs. Cultural factors involved users' competence with IT and resistance to change. Organisational factors referred to insufficient organisational resources and training, while technical factors included inadequate local technical infrastructure. Many of these factors, such as integrating the EHR system with day-to-day operational processes, staff training and adequate local IT infrastructure, were likely to apply to system implementations in various settings, but we also identified factors that related particularly to implementing EHRs in mental health hospitals, for example: EHR system incompatibility with IT systems used by mental health-related sectors, notably social services; the EHR system lacking specific, mental health functionalities and options; and clinicians feeling unable to use computers while attending to distressed psychiatric patients.

Conclusions: A better conceptual model of reasons for workarounds should help with designing, and supporting the implementation and adoption of, EHRs for use in hospital mental health settings.

Citing Articles

What engagement strategies are useful in facilitating the implementation of electronic health records in health care settings? A rapid review of qualitative evidence synthesis using the normalization process theory.

Zharima C, Mhlanga S, Abdulla S, Goudge J, Griffiths F Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241291286.

PMID: 39497787 PMC: 11533323. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241291286.


From use, value and user-centered design to context: A mixed methods analysis of a hospital electronic medical record enhancement.

Robertson S, Brauer S, Burton-Jones A, Grimley R, Rosbergen I Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241279208.

PMID: 39372815 PMC: 11450561. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241279208.


Using information technology to integrate tobacco use treatment in routine oncology care: Lessons learned from the U.S. Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Cancer Centers.

Bird J, Nguyen C, Hohl S, DAngelo H, Pauk D, Adsit R Implement Res Pract. 2023; 4:26334895231185374.

PMID: 37790167 PMC: 10331328. DOI: 10.1177/26334895231185374.


Finding the 'sweet spot' between customisation and workflows when optimising ePrescribing systems: a multisite qualitative study.

Heeney C, Malden S, Sheikh A BMJ Open. 2022; 12(12):e062391.

PMID: 36576184 PMC: 9723895. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062391.


Impact of Electronic Health Records on Information Practices in Mental Health Contexts: Scoping Review.

Kariotis T, Prictor M, Chang S, Gray K J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(5):e30405.

PMID: 35507393 PMC: 9118021. DOI: 10.2196/30405.


References
1.
Rouf E, Chumley H, Dobbie A . Electronic health records in outpatient clinics: perspectives of third year medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2008; 8:13. PMC: 2294117. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-13. View

2.
Stewart R, Kroth P, Schuyler M, Bailey R . Do electronic health records affect the patient-psychiatrist relationship? A before & after study of psychiatric outpatients. BMC Psychiatry. 2010; 10:3. PMC: 2818653. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-3. View

3.
Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles J, Karsh B . Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15(4):408-23. PMC: 2442264. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2616. View

4.
Ventres W, Kooienga S, Vuckovic N, Marlin R, Nygren P, Stewart V . Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2006; 4(2):124-31. PMC: 1467009. DOI: 10.1370/afm.425. View

5.
Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T . Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation. BMJ. 2010; 341:c4564. PMC: 2933355. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c4564. View