» Articles » PMID: 24454593

Cost Analysis of Fixed-dose Combination of Dutasteride and Tamsulosin Compared with Concomitant Dutasteride and Tamsulosin Monotherapy in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Canada

Overview
Specialty Urology
Date 2014 Jan 24
PMID 24454593
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: We estimate the lifetime cost of treatment for moderate/severe symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a cohort of Canadian men aged 50 to 59, and we evaluate the costs of 2 daily bioequivalent treatment options: fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dutasteride (0.5 mg) and tamsulosin (0.4 mg), or concomitant administration of dutasteride (0.5 mg) and tamsulosin (0.4 mg) monotherapies.

Methods: The expected lifetime costs were estimated by modelling the incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR), BPH-related surgery and clinical progression over a patient's lifetime (up to 25 years). A model was developed to simulate clinical events over time, based on a discrete Markov process with 6 mutually exclusive health states and annual cycle length.

Results: The estimated lifetime budget cost for the cohort of 374 110 men aged 50 to 59 in Canada is between $6.35 billion and $7.60 billion, equivalent to between $16 979 and $20 315 per patient with moderate/severe symptoms associated with BPH. Costs are lower for FDC treatment, with the net difference in lifetime budget impact between the 2 treatment regimens at $1.25 billion. In this analysis, the true costs of BPH in Canada are underestimated for 2 main reasons: (1) to make the analysis tractable, it is restricted to a cohort aged 50 to 59, whereas BPH can affect all men; and (2) a closed cohort approach does not include the costs of new (incident) cases.

Conclusion: Canadian clinical guidelines recommend the use of the combination of tamsulosin and dutasteride for men with moderate/severe symptoms associated with BPH and enlarged prostate volume. This analysis, using a representational patient group, suggests that the FDC is a more cost-effective treatment option for BPH.

Citing Articles

Fixed-dose combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Dimitropoulos K, Gravas S Ther Adv Urol. 2016; 8(1):19-28.

PMID: 26834837 PMC: 4707422. DOI: 10.1177/1756287215607419.


Patient's adherence on pharmacological therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is different: is combination therapy better than monotherapy?.

Cindolo L, Pirozzi L, Sountoulides P, Fanizza C, Romero M, Castellan P BMC Urol. 2015; 15:96.

PMID: 26391357 PMC: 4578263. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-015-0090-x.

References
1.
Ismaila A, Walker A, Sayani A, Laroche B, Nickel J, Posnett J . Cost-effectiveness of dutasteride-tamsulosin combination therapy for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: A Canadian model based on the CombAT trial. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013; 7(5-6):E393-401. PMC: 3699085. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.12131. View

2.
Cai G, Thiessen J, Baidoo C, Fossler M . Operating characteristics of a partial-block randomized crossover bioequivalence study for dutasteride, a drug with a long half-life: investigation through simulation and comparison with final results. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 50(10):1142-50. DOI: 10.1177/0091270009355155. View

3.
Emberton M, Anson K . Acute urinary retention in men: an age old problem. BMJ. 1999; 318(7188):921-5. PMC: 1115341. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.921. View

4.
McDonald H, Hux M, Brisson M, Bernard L, Nickel J . An economic evaluation of doxazosin, finasteride and combination therapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can J Urol. 2004; 11(4):2327-40. View

5.
Garraway W, Russell E, Lee R, Collins G, McKelvie G, Hehir M . Impact of previously unrecognized benign prostatic hyperplasia on the daily activities of middle-aged and elderly men. Br J Gen Pract. 1993; 43(373):318-21. PMC: 1372554. View