» Articles » PMID: 24451863

Gingival Margin Changes in Maxillary Anterior Sites After Single Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization: a 5-year Retrospective Study of 47 Patients

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2014 Jan 24
PMID 24451863
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate gingival margin changes in the esthetic zone after immediate implant placement and provisionalization over 5 years with a custom anatomic provisional abutment.

Materials And Methods: Single maxillary incisor immediate implant placement and provisionalization procedures, completed and followed between February 2006 and August 2006, were analyzed retrospectively. During clinical recalls at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years, changes in gingival margins were recorded with clinical photographs and recorded in millimeters.

Results: Forty-seven patients each received a single implant (19 central incisors, 28 lateral incisors) and were followed for 5 years. Implants and restorations had a 100% survival rate during the study. The mean gingival margin changes (recession) were 0.17 mm at the time of definitive restoration, 0.27 mm at 3 months, 0.30 mm at 1 year, and 0.30 mm at 5 years. After 5 years, 24 of the 47 implant crowns had no significant gingival recession. All central incisor sites received 4.3-mm-diameter implants and had a mean change in tooth length of 0.03 mm at 5 years. Lateral incisor sites (n=28) received either a 3.5-mm-diameter implant (n=20) or a 4.3-mm-diameter implant (n=8). Lateral sites with the 3.5-mm implant had a mean change in gingival margin height of 0.08 mm of tooth length at 5 years; lateral sites with a 4.3-mm platform displayed a mean change of 0.82 mm of tooth length.

Conclusion: This study suggests that implant diameter, gingival biotype, surgical technique, and/or the reason for tooth loss can influence the amount of gingival recession occurring over 5 years. Most recession occurred within the first 3 months, between implant placement/provisionalization and definitive restoration. The use of a customized anatomic provisional abutment can reduce the amount and frequency of recession.

Citing Articles

Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials-1 Year Results.

Strasding M, Jeong Y, Marchand L, Hicklin S, Sailer I, Sun M Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(16).

PMID: 37629928 PMC: 10456968. DOI: 10.3390/ma16165636.


A full digital workflow to prefabricate an implant-supported interim restoration: case report and a novel technique.

Fu Y, Yin C, Li S, Li D, Mo A Int J Implant Dent. 2022; 8(1):55.

PMID: 36322245 PMC: 9630484. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-022-00455-x.


CBCT analysis of the tissue thickness at immediate implant placement with contour augmentation in the maxillary anterior zone: a 1-year prospective clinical study.

Fujita Y, Nakano T, Ono S, Shimomoto T, Mizuno K, Yatani H Int J Implant Dent. 2021; 7(1):59.

PMID: 34227040 PMC: 8257803. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00344-9.


Facial mucosal level of single immediately placed implants with either immediate provisionalization or delayed restoration: An intermediate-term study.

Bushahri A, Kripfgans O, George F, Wang I, Wang H, Chan H J Periodontol. 2021; 92(9):1213-1221.

PMID: 33386743 PMC: 8941487. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.20-0746.


Aesthetics outcome of immediately restored single implants placed in extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla: A case series study.

Saedi Germi A, Ghasemi Barghi V, Jafari K, Nemati R, Yeganzad S J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020; 14(1):48-53.

PMID: 32454958 PMC: 7235693. DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2020.007.