» Articles » PMID: 24448972

Efficacy and Acceptability of Acute Treatments for Persistent Depressive Disorder: a Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Depress Anxiety
Publisher Wiley
Date 2014 Jan 23
PMID 24448972
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the relative efficacy and acceptability of specific treatments for persistent depressive disorder.

Methods: We searched several databases up to January 2013 and included randomized controlled trials that compared acute pharmacological, psychotherapeutic, and combined interventions with each other or placebo. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients who responded to (efficacy) or dropped out from (acceptability) the allocated treatment. Data synthesis was performed with network meta-analysis.

Results: A network of 45 trials that tested 28 drugs included data from 5,806 and 5,348 patients concerning efficacy and acceptability, respectively. A second network of 15 trials that tested five psychotherapeutic and five combined interventions included data from 2,657 and 2,719 patients concerning efficacy and acceptability, respectively. Among sufficiently tested treatments, fluoxetine (odds ratio (OR) 2.94), paroxetine (3.79), sertraline (4.47), moclobemide (6.98), imipramine (4.53), ritanserin (2.35), amisulpride (5.63), and acetyl-l-carnitine (5.67) were significantly more effective than placebo. Pairwise comparisons showed advantages of moclobemide (2.38) and amisulpride (1.92) over fluoxetine. Sertraline (0.57) and amisulpride (0.53) showed a lower dropout rate than imipramine. Interpersonal psychotherapy with medication outperformed medication alone in chronic major depression but not in dysthymia. Evidence on cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy plus medication was partly inconclusive. Interpersonal psychotherapy was less effective than medication (0.48) and cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (0.45). Several other treatments were tested in single studies.

Conclusions: Several evidence-based acute pharmacological, psychotherapeutic, and combined treatments for persistent depressive disorder are available with significant differences between them.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy, or their combination, in chronic depression: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis using aggregated and individual patient data.

Schramm E, Elsaesser M, Muller J, Kwarteng N, Evrenoglou T, Cuijpers P BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e089356.

PMID: 39971604 PMC: 11840898. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089356.


Metta-Based Therapy for Chronic Depression: a Wait List Control Trial.

Stangier U, Frick A, Thinnes I, Arens E, Hofmann S Mindfulness (N Y). 2024; 12(12):2929-2942.

PMID: 38665227 PMC: 11044848. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-021-01753-y.


The clinical effectiveness of a self-management intervention for patients with persistent depressive disorder and their partners/caregivers: results from a multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Solis E, Carlier I, Kamminga N, Giltay E, van Hemert A Trials. 2024; 25(1):187.

PMID: 38481289 PMC: 10938802. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08033-9.


Conceptual foundations of acetylcarnitine supplementation in neuropsychiatric long COVID syndrome: a narrative review.

Helbing D, Dommaschk E, Danyeli L, Liepinsh E, Refisch A, Sen Z Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024; 274(8):1829-1845.

PMID: 38172332 PMC: 11579146. DOI: 10.1007/s00406-023-01734-3.


Infra-Low-Frequency Neurofeedback Treatment in Dysthymia: A Case Study.

Tschiesner R Behav Sci (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37753989 PMC: 10525676. DOI: 10.3390/bs13090711.