» Articles » PMID: 24436908

Patterns of Hearing Loss Following Retrosigmoid Excision of Unilateral Vestibular Schwannoma

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2014 Jan 18
PMID 24436908
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives To determine the pattern of auditory responses, time-course of hearing deterioration, and possible site of lesion following retrosigmoid excision of unilateral vestibular schwannomas. Design Prospective, nonrandomized, observational pilot study. Setting Tertiary referral medical center. Main outcome measures Preoperative and postoperative pure-tone and speech audiometry, auditory brainstem response testing, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions were performed in 20 patients. Testing was conducted every 24 hours for the duration of hospitalization. Transtympanic electrocochleography was performed if delayed deterioration of auditory responses was documented. Results Of the 20 patients, 7 had no discernible cochlear nerve at the end of the procedure. Of the 13 patients with an intact nerve, 6 retained hearing, 3 with evidence of reduced neural function. Of the 7 who lost hearing despite an intact nerve, 5 lost at least cochlear and possibly also neural function, and 1 had reduced neural function but retained cochlear function. There were two examples of delayed deterioration of cochlear nerve responses. Conclusions Hearing loss following retrosigmoid removal of vestibular schwannomas most often involves loss of at least cochlear function, possibly in addition to neural damage. In a smaller number of cases anacusis or hearing deterioration can be attributed to purely neural trauma.

Citing Articles

Hearing improvement after vestibular schwannoma surgery in the era of the hearing preservation rule - case report and literature review.

Fik Z, Lazak J, Hruba S, cada Z, Zverrna E, Betka J Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2021; 166(3):347-352.

PMID: 34897296 DOI: 10.5507/bp.2021.067.

References
1.
PERLMAN H, Kimura R, Fernandez C . Experiments on temporary obstruction of the internal auditory artery. Laryngoscope. 1959; 69(6):591-613. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-195906000-00001. View

2.
Sabin H, Prasher D, Bentivoglio P, Symon L . Preservation of cochlear potentials in a deaf patient fifteen months after excision of an acoustic neuroma. Scand Audiol. 1987; 16(2):109-11. DOI: 10.3109/01050398709042164. View

3.
Josey A, GLASSCOCK 3rd M, Jackson C . Preservation of hearing in acoustic tumor surgery: audiologic indicators. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988; 97(6 Pt 1):626-30. DOI: 10.1177/000348948809700609. View

4.
Sekiya T, Moller A, Jannetta P . Pathophysiological mechanisms of intraoperative and postoperative hearing deficits in cerebellopontine angle surgery: an experimental study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1986; 81(3-4):142-51. DOI: 10.1007/BF01401237. View

5.
Morlet T, Dubreuil C, Duclaux R, Ferber-Viart C . Preoperative speech and pure-tone audiometry in four types of patients with acoustic neuroma. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003; 24(5):297-305. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(03)00057-7. View