» Articles » PMID: 24433247

Cardiopulmonary Bypass Standby Avoids Fatality Due to Vascular Laceration in Laser-assisted Lead Extraction

Overview
Journal J Card Surg
Date 2014 Jan 18
PMID 24433247
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Vascular laceration is a rare but potentially fatal complication with excimer laser-assisted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction. We report our experience on management of vascular laceration during laser-assisted lead extraction.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 140 consecutive patients undergoing laser-assisted lead extraction from May 2004 to March 2011. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients with and without intraoperative vascular laceration. Risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression.

Results: All cases were performed in the operating room with cardiopulmonary bypass standby. Complete lead removal was achieved in 118 (84.3%) patients. Potentially fatal complications occurred in five patients (3.6%) who had superior vena cava and/or innominate vein laceration. Lacerated veins were repaired under emergency sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean time from vascular laceration to establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass was 6.0 ± 3.6 minutes. All five patients survived without neurological sequelae. The rates of dual-coil leads (80.0% vs. 31.9%, p=0.025) and history of lead revision (100.0% vs. 40.0%, p=0.008) were significantly higher in the five patients who had major vascular laceration than those who did not. Logistic regression showed that dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead was an independent risk factor for vascular laceration (odds ratio 11.264, p=0.048).

Conclusion: Cardiopulmonary bypass standby is helpful when performing laser-assisted lead extraction to treat potentially fatal vascular laceration. Dual-coil lead is an independent risk factor to predict intraoperative vascular laceration.

Citing Articles

Comparison of non-laser and laser transvenous lead extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Akhtar Z, Kontogiannis C, Georgiopoulos G, Starck C, Leung L, Lee S Europace. 2023; 25(11).

PMID: 37882609 PMC: 10638006. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad316.


Assessment of the impact of organisational model of transvenous lead extraction on the effectiveness and safety of procedure: an observational study.

Tulecki L, Jachec W, Polewczyk A, Czajkowski M, Targonska S, Tomkow K BMJ Open. 2022; 12(12):e062952.

PMID: 36581437 PMC: 9806044. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062952.


The role of cardiac surgery in transvenous lead extraction. A high-volume center experience with 3207 procedures.

Tulecki L, Czajkowski M, Targonska S, Tomkow K, Nowosielecka D, Jachec W Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2022; 19(3):122-129.

PMID: 36268484 PMC: 9574584. DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2022.119759.


Is cardiopulmonary bypass standby still required for laser lead extractions?.

Volk L, Verghis N, Ikegami H, Takebe M, Russo M, Lee L J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022; 17(1):235.

PMID: 36109812 PMC: 9476252. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01987-4.


Comparison between laser sheaths, femoral approach and rotating mechanical sheaths for lead extraction.

Bracke F, Rademakers N, Verberkmoes N, van t Veer M, van Gelder B Neth Heart J. 2021; 30(5):267-272.

PMID: 34932200 PMC: 9043163. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-021-01652-w.