» Articles » PMID: 24432355

Behavioural and Physiological Expression of Arousal During Decision-making in Laying Hens

Overview
Journal Physiol Behav
Date 2014 Jan 17
PMID 24432355
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human studies suggest that prior emotional responses are stored within the brain as associations called somatic markers and are recalled to inform rapid decision-making. Consequently, behavioural and physiological indicators of arousal are detectable in humans when making decisions, and influence decision outcomes. Here we provide the first evidence of anticipatory arousal around the time of decision-making in non-human animals. Chickens were subjected to five experimental conditions, which varied in the number (one versus two), type (mealworms or empty bowl) and choice (same or different) of T-maze goals. As indicators of arousal, heart-rate and head movements were measured when goals were visible but not accessible; latency to reach the goal indicated motivation. We found a greater increase in heart-rate from baseline to the goal-viewing period, more head movements and shorter latencies in all conditions including mealworms compared to those with empty bowls. More head movements when two mealworm bowls were available compared to just one, and prior to occasions when hens accessed an empty bowl rather than declining to move, showed that arousal preceded and influenced decision-making. Our results provide an important foundation for investigating arousal during animal decision-making and suggest that the somatic-marker hypothesis might not only apply to humans.

Citing Articles

An Interactive Feeder to Induce and Assess Emotions from Vocalisations of Chickens.

Golfidis A, Kriengwatana B, Mounir M, Norton T Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38731390 PMC: 11083406. DOI: 10.3390/ani14091386.


Goats distinguish between positive and negative emotion-linked vocalisations.

Baciadonna L, Briefer E, Favaro L, McElligott A Front Zool. 2019; 16:25.

PMID: 31320917 PMC: 6617626. DOI: 10.1186/s12983-019-0323-z.


Functional flexibility in wild bonobo vocal behaviour.

Clay Z, Archbold J, Zuberbuhler K PeerJ. 2015; 3:e1124.

PMID: 26290789 PMC: 4540007. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1124.


Effect of reward downshift on the behaviour and physiology of chickens.

Davies A, Nicol C, Radford A Anim Behav. 2015; 105:21-28.

PMID: 26257402 PMC: 4510205. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.005.


Elevated arousal at time of decision-making is not the arbiter of risk avoidance in chickens.

Davies A, Radford A, Pettersson I, Yang F, Nicol C Sci Rep. 2015; 5:8200.

PMID: 25643655 PMC: 4314631. DOI: 10.1038/srep08200.


References
1.
Reefmann N, Butikofer Kaszas F, Wechsler B, Gygax L . Physiological expression of emotional reactions in sheep. Physiol Behav. 2009; 98(1-2):235-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.05.017. View

2.
Studer B, Clark L . Place your bets: psychophysiological correlates of decision-making under risk. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011; 11(2):144-58. PMC: 3084947. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-011-0025-2. View

3.
Browne W, Caplen G, Edgar J, Wilson L, Nicol C . Consistency, transitivity and inter-relationships between measures of choice in environmental preference tests with chickens. Behav Processes. 2009; 83(1):72-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.10.004. View

4.
Guillaume S, Jollant F, Jaussent I, Lawrence N, Malafosse A, Courtet P . Somatic markers and explicit knowledge are both involved in decision-making. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47(10):2120-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.003. View

5.
Bruce E, Prescott N, Wathes C . Preferred food rewards for laying hens in behavioural experiments. Br Poult Sci. 2003; 44(3):345-9. DOI: 10.1080/0007166031000085490. View