» Articles » PMID: 24430877

Information Needs of Parents for Acute Childhood Illness: Determining 'what, How, Where and When' of Safety Netting Using a Qualitative Exploration with Parents and Clinicians

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Jan 17
PMID 24430877
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the views of parents and clinicians regarding the optimal content, format and delivery of safety netting information for acute childhood illness.

Design: Qualitative study including semistructured focus groups and interviews.

Setting: First contact care settings, community centres, children's centres and nurseries in the Midlands, UK.

Participants: 27 parents from a travelling community, Asian British community and white British community. Sixteen clinicians including 10 doctors and 6 nurses from a general practice surgery, an out-of-hours service and two emergency departments (paediatric and combined adult and paediatric).

Results: Participants described a need for safety netting to contain information on signs and symptoms of serious and common illnesses, illness management and where and when to seek help. Resources should be basic, simple to use and contain simple symbols. A key criterion was professional endorsement of resources. Internet-based information was desired which is reliable, consistent and up-to-date. Participants described a need for different types of information: that which could be delivered during consultations, as well as more general information for parents to access before consulting a healthcare professional. Face-to-face education, written materials and digital media were suggested delivery mechanisms. Audiovisual material was preferred by families with low literacy. Participants commonly suggested internet-based and phone-based resources, but the travelling community was less comfortable with these approaches.

Conclusions: A multifaceted and tailored approach to safety netting is needed so that effective resources are available for parents with varying information needs, literacy levels and ability to use information technology. We have identified key aspects of content, quality criteria, format and delivery mechanisms for safety netting information from the perspectives of clinicians and parents. Resources should be coproduced with parents and clinicians to ensure that they are valued and utilised by both groups.

Citing Articles

Role of communicating diagnostic uncertainty in the safety-netting process: insights from a vignette study.

Cox C, Hatfield T, Fritz Z BMJ Qual Saf. 2024; 33(12):769-779.

PMID: 39237262 PMC: 11671892. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-017037.


Effectiveness of safety-netting approaches for acutely ill children: a network meta-analysis.

Burvenich R, Bos D, Lowie L, Peeters K, Toelen J, Wynants L Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 75(751):e90-e97.

PMID: 39117428 PMC: 11694319. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0141.


Safety-netting advice documentation in out-of-hours primary care: a retrospective cohort from 2013 to 2020.

Edwards P, Edwards P, Finnikin S, Finnikin S, Wilson F, Bennett-Britton I Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 75(751):e80-e89.

PMID: 38950945 PMC: 11694318. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0057.


Exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals on providing supported asthma self-management for Bangladeshi and Pakistani people in the UK.

Ahmed S, Pinnock H, Steed L PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0302357.

PMID: 38857297 PMC: 11164332. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302357.


Educating caregivers about fever - what and why?.

Roland D Pediatr Res. 2024; 96(1):33-34.

PMID: 38486081 PMC: 11257938. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03134-2.


References
1.
Saxena S, Bottle A, Gilbert R, Sharland M . Increasing short-stay unplanned hospital admissions among children in England; time trends analysis '97-'06. PLoS One. 2009; 4(10):e7484. PMC: 2758998. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007484. View

2.
Neill S . Containing acute childhood illness within family life: a substantive grounded theory. J Child Health Care. 2010; 14(4):327-44. DOI: 10.1177/1367493510380078. View

3.
Thompson M, Ninis N, Perera R, Mayon-White R, Phillips C, Bailey L . Clinical recognition of meningococcal disease in children and adolescents. Lancet. 2006; 367(9508):397-403. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67932-4. View

4.
Gill P, Goldacre M, Mant D, Heneghan C, Thomson A, Seagroatt V . Increase in emergency admissions to hospital for children aged under 15 in England, 1999-2010: national database analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2013; 98(5):328-34. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302383. View

5.
Buntinx F, Mant D, Van den Bruel A, Donner-Banzhof N, Dinant G . Dealing with low-incidence serious diseases in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61(582):43-6. PMC: 3020049. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X548974. View