» Articles » PMID: 24430100

CDC Grand Rounds: a Public Health Approach to Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence

Overview
Date 2014 Jan 17
PMID 24430100
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious, and preventable, public health problem in the United States. IPV can involve physical and sexual violence, threats of physical or sexual violence, and psychological abuse, including stalking. It can occur within opposite-sex or same-sex couples and can range from one incident to an ongoing pattern of violence. On average, 24 persons per minute are victims of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner in the United States. These numbers underestimate the problem because many victims do not report IPV to police, friends, or families. In 2010, IPV contributed to 1,295 deaths, accounting for 10% of all homicides for that year. The combined medical, mental health, and lost productivity costs of IPV against women are estimated to exceed $8.3 billion per year. In addition to the economic burden of IPV, victims are more likely to experience adverse health outcomes, such as depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, suicidal behavior, sexually transmitted infections, and unintended pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Experiences of intimate partner violence among female cancer patients: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Huai Q, Zhang R, Shi Y, Shao M, Yang L Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33(3):212.

PMID: 39982538 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09277-0.


Dorsal CA3 overactivation mediates witnessing stress-induced recognition memory deficits in adolescent male mice.

Liu X, Liu R, Sun Y, Wang H, Wang H, Wang T Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024; 49(11):1666-1677.

PMID: 38504012 PMC: 11399124. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01848-9.


Depression, Stress and the Mediating Role of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Among Israeli Women of Childbearing Age in the Shadow of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Halperin O, Ali-Saleh O, Ore L, Jadaon J J Interpers Violence. 2022; 38(3-4):3586-3611.

PMID: 35899767 PMC: 10076180. DOI: 10.1177/08862605221111415.


The possible impact of increased physical intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic on ocular health.

Hicks P, Murtaugh M, Deangelis M SAGE Open Med. 2021; 9:20503121211035263.

PMID: 34377470 PMC: 8326617. DOI: 10.1177/20503121211035263.


"You Never Know What Could Happen": Women's Perspectives of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the Context of Recent Intimate Partner Violence.

Willie T, Keene D, Kershaw T, Stockman J Womens Health Issues. 2019; 30(1):41-48.

PMID: 31537431 PMC: 6919558. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.08.001.


References
1.
Vagi K, Rothman E, Latzman N, Teten Tharp A, Hall D, Breiding M . Beyond correlates: a review of risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence perpetration. J Youth Adolesc. 2013; 42(4):633-49. PMC: 3697003. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-013-9907-7. View

2.
Eaton D, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Flint K, Hawkins J . Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012; 61(4):1-162. View

3.
Foshee V, Bauman K, Ennett S, Linder G, Benefield T, Suchindran C . Assessing the long-term effects of the Safe Dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(4):619-24. PMC: 1448308. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.619. View

4.
Feinberg M, Jones D, Kan M, Goslin M . Effects of family foundations on parents and children: 3.5 years after baseline. J Fam Psychol. 2010; 24(5):532-42. DOI: 10.1037/a0020837. View

5.
Max W, Rice D, Finkelstein E, Bardwell R, Leadbetter S . The economic toll of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Violence Vict. 2005; 19(3):259-72. DOI: 10.1891/vivi.19.3.259.65767. View