» Articles » PMID: 24430025

Otolith Signals Contribute to Inter-individual Differences in the Perception of Gravity-centered Space

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Jan 17
PMID 24430025
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate (1) the relative contribution of the egocentric reference as well as body orientation perception to visual horizon percept during tilt or during increased gravito-inertial acceleration (GiA, hypergravity environment) conditions and (2) the role of vestibular signals in the inter-individual differences observed in these perceptual modalities. Perceptual estimates analysis showed that backward tilt induced (1) an elevation of the visual horizon, (2) an elevation of the egocentric estimation (visual straight ahead) and (3) an overestimation of body tilt. The increase in the magnitude of GiA induced (1) a lowering of the apparent horizon, (2) a lowering of the straight ahead and (3) a perception of backward tilt. Overall, visual horizon percept can be expressed as the combination of body orientation perception and egocentric estimation. When assessing otolith reactivity using off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR), only visual egocentric estimation was significantly correlated with horizontal OVAR performance. On the one hand, we found a correlation between a low modulation amplitude of the otolith responses and straight ahead accuracy when the head axis was tilted relative to gravity. On the other hand, the bias of otolith responses was significantly correlated with straight ahead accuracy when subjects were submitted to an increase in the GiA. Thus, straight ahead sense would be dependent to some extent to otolith function. These results are discussed in terms of the contribution of otolith inputs in the overall multimodal integration subtending spatial constancy.

Citing Articles

Neuroanatomical correlates of the perception of body axis orientation during body tilt: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Tani K, Tanaka S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):14659.

PMID: 34282178 PMC: 8289860. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93961-8.


Increased brain responsivity to galvanic vestibular stimulation in bilateral vestibular failure.

Helmchen C, Rother M, Spliethoff P, Sprenger A Neuroimage Clin. 2019; 24:101942.

PMID: 31382239 PMC: 6690736. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101942.


Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action.

Jorges B, Lopez-Moliner J Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:203.

PMID: 28503140 PMC: 5408029. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00203.

References
1.
Paillard A, Denise P, Barraud P, Roux A, Cian C . The elevator illusion results from the combination of body orientation and egocentric perception. Neurosci Lett. 2009; 464(3):156-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.027. View

2.
Darlot C, Denise P, Droulez J, Cohen B, Berthoz A . Eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 73(1):91-105. DOI: 10.1007/BF00279664. View

3.
Angelaki D, Perachio A, Mustari M, Strunk C . Role of irregular otolith afferents in the steady-state nystagmus during off-vertical axis rotation. J Neurophysiol. 1992; 68(5):1895-900. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.5.1895. View

4.
Matin L, Li W . Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation. J Vestib Res. 1995; 5(6):499-518. View

5.
Carriot J, Barraud P, Nougier V, Cian C . Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 174(1):158-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0434-6. View