» Articles » PMID: 24428823

Strengthening the Perception-assessment Tools for Dengue Prevention: a Cross-sectional Survey in a Temperate Region (Madeira, Portugal)

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Jan 17
PMID 24428823
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Community participation is mandatory in the prevention of Dengue outbreaks. Taking public views into account is crucial to guide more effective planning and quicker community participation in preventing campaigns. This study aims to assess community perceptions of Madeira population in order to explore their involvement in the A. aegypti's control and reinforce health-educational planning. Due to the lack of accurate methodologies for measuring perception, a new tool to assess the community's perceptions was built.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed in the Island's aegypti-infested area, exploring residents' perceptions regarding most critical community behaviour: aegypti-source reduction and their domestic aegypti-breeding sites. A novel tool defining five essential topics which underlie the source reduction's awareness and accession was built, herein called Essential-Perception (EP) analysis.

Results: Of 1276 individuals, 1182 completed the questionnaire (92 · 6%). EP-Score analysis revealed that community's perceptions were scarce, inconsistent and possibly incorrect. Most of the population (99 · 6%) did not completely understood the five essential topics explored. An average of 54 · 2% of residents only partially understood each essential topic, revealing inconsistencies in their understanding. Each resident apparently believed in an average of four false assumptions/myths. Significant association (p<0.001) was found between both the EP-Score level and the domestic presence of breeding sites, supporting the validity of this EP-analysis. Aedes aegypti's breeding sites, consisting of décor/leisure containers, presented an atypical pattern of infestation comparing with dengue prone regions.

Conclusions: The studied population was not prepared for being fully engaged in dengue prevention. Evidences suggest that EP-methodology was efficient and accurate in assessing the community perception and its compliance to practices. Moreover, it suggested a list of myths that could persist in the community. This is the first study reporting an aegypti-entomological pattern and community's perception in a developed dengue-prone region. Tailored messages considering findings of this study are recommended to be used in future campaigns in order to more effectively impact the community perception and behaviour.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of the MosquitoWise survey to assess perceptions towards mosquitoes and mosquito-borne viruses in Europe.

Abourashed A, de Best P, Doornekamp L, Sikkema R, van Gorp E, Timen A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1777.

PMID: 38245571 PMC: 10799950. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52219-9.


arrives in Lisbon: an emerging public health threat.

Nazareth T, Seixas G, Lourenco J, Bettencourt P Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1332334.

PMID: 38169710 PMC: 10758473. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1332334.


Moringa as a household water purification method - community perception and pilot study in Guinea-Bissau.

Bancessi A, Teodosio R, Duarte E, Balde A, Catarino L, Nazareth T BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1953.

PMID: 36271392 PMC: 9587536. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14344-w.


School-based health education for dengue control in Kelantan, Malaysia: Impact on knowledge, attitude and practice.

AhbiRami R, Zuharah W PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020; 14(3):e0008075.

PMID: 32218580 PMC: 7141698. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008075.


Measuring Consumer Willingness to Pay to Reduce Health Risks of Contracting Dengue Fever.

Lin C, Huang Y, Liao L, Ting C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(5).

PMID: 32164392 PMC: 7084867. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051810.


References
1.
Burkot T, Handzel T, Schmaedick M, Tufa J, Roberts J, Graves P . Productivity of natural and artificial containers for Aedes polynesiensis and Aedes aegypti in four American Samoan villages. Med Vet Entomol. 2007; 21(1):22-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00667.x. View

2.
Rosenbaum J, Nathan M, Ragoonanansingh R, Rawlins S, Gayle C, Chadee D . Community participation in dengue prevention and control: a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Trinidad and Tobago. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995; 53(2):111-7. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.111. View

3.
Santos S, Cabral A, Augusto L . [Knowledge, attitude and practice on dengue, the vector and control in an urban community of the Northeast Region, Brazil]. Cien Saude Colet. 2011; 16 Suppl 1:1319-30. DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000700066. View

4.
Gubler D, Clark G . Community-based integrated control of Aedes aegypti: a brief overview of current programs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994; 50(6 Suppl):50-60. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.50.50. View

5.
Pelto P, Pelto G . Studying knowledge, culture, and behavior in applied medical anthropology. Med Anthropol Q. 1997; 11(2):147-63. DOI: 10.1525/maq.1997.11.2.147. View