» Articles » PMID: 24421720

Backstroke Technical Characterization of 11-13 Year-old Swimmers

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Jan 15
PMID 24421720
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterize the backstroke swimming technique of 11-13 year-old swimmers when performing at very high intensity. A sample of 114 swimmers was divided into four groups regarding maturational and gender effect, who performed 25- m backstroke swimming at 50-m pace. Using two underwater cameras the general biomechanical parameters (speed, stroke rate, stroke length and stroke index), the arm stroke phases and two indexes of arm coordination (Index of Coordination 1, which characterizes the continuity between propulsive phases of each arm and Index of Coordination 2 that evaluates the simultaneity between the beginning of the pull of one arm and of the recovery of the other arm) were measured. Post- pubertal swimmers achieved higher values of speed (1.06 ± 0.14 and 1.18 ± 0.14 m·s(-1) for pubertal and 1.13 ± 0.14 and 1.24 ± 0.12 m·s(-1) for post-pubertal girl and boy swimmers, respectively), stroke length (1.64 ± 0.26 and 1.68 ± 0.25 m·cycle(-1) for pubertal and 1.79 ± 0.22 and 1.75 ± 0.27 m·cycle(-1) for post-pubertal girls and boys, respectively) and stroke index. Regar-ding genders, male were faster than female swimmers. Boys also showed a higher stroke rate and stroke index than girls, who achieved higher results in the ratio between stroke length and arm span. As it was expected, no hand lag time was noticed in young swimmers. Although no differences were noticed between genders, the Index of Coordination 1 was in catch-up mode (-9.89 ± 3.16 and -10.16 ± 3.60 % for girls and -9.77 ± 2.93 and -10.39 ± 2.44 % for boys pubertal and post-pubertal, respectively) and the Index of Coordination 2 was in superposition mode (1.86 ± 4.39 and 2.25 ± 2.25 % from girls and 1.72 ± 2.62 and 1.95 ± 2.95 % for boys, pubertal and post-pubertal, respectively). Key PointsYoung swimmers adopt the catch-up arm coordina-tion when swimming backstroke.These swimmers present lower stroking parameters then those published for older and higher level swimmers.No hand lag time at the thigh was noticed, meaning that young swimmers perform the final phase of their arm cycle without inducing discontinuity be-tween the propulsive actions of the two arms.

Citing Articles

Analysis of the fastest backstroke age group swimmers competing in the World Masters Championships 1986-2024.

Fariod M, Seffrin A, Andrade M, Wilhelm M, Weiss K, Ahmad W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17214.

PMID: 39060396 PMC: 11282104. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68222-z.


Velocity Variability and Performance in Backstroke in Elite and Good-Level Swimmers.

Fernandes A, Goethel M, Marinho D, Mezencio B, Vilas-Boas J, Fernandes R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(11).

PMID: 35682325 PMC: 9180488. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116744.


Young Swimmers' Anthropometrics, Biomechanics, Energetics, and Efficiency as Underlying Performance Factors: A Systematic Narrative Review.

Morais J, Barbosa T, Forte P, Silva A, Marinho D Front Physiol. 2021; 12:691919.

PMID: 34603070 PMC: 8481572. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.691919.


Body roll amplitude and timing in backstroke swimming and their differences from front crawl at the same swimming intensities.

Gonjo T, Fernandes R, Vilas-Boas J, Sanders R Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):824.

PMID: 33436944 PMC: 7804020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80711-5.

References
1.
Chollet D, Chalies S, Chatard J . A new index of coordination for the crawl: description and usefulness. Int J Sports Med. 2000; 21(1):54-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8855. View

2.
Saavedra J, Escalante Y, Rodriguez F . A multivariate analysis of performance in young swimmers. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010; 22(1):135-51. DOI: 10.1123/pes.22.1.135. View

3.
Lerda R, Cardelli C . Analysis of stroke organization in the backstroke as a function of skill. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003; 74(2):215-9. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609083. View

4.
Fernandes R, Ribeiro J, Figueiredo P, Seifert L, Vilas-Boas J . Kinematics of the hip and body center of mass in front crawl. J Hum Kinet. 2013; 33:15-23. PMC: 3588675. DOI: 10.2478/v10078-012-0040-6. View

5.
Andrews C, Bakewell J, Scurr J . Comparison of advanced and intermediate 200-m backstroke swimmers' dominant and non-dominant shoulder entry angles across various swimming speeds. J Sports Sci. 2011; 29(7):743-8. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2011.553961. View