» Articles » PMID: 24411017

A Novel Microfluidic Wound Model for Testing Antimicrobial Agents Against Staphylococcus Pseudintermedius Biofilms

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2014 Jan 14
PMID 24411017
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current methods for testing treatments for veterinary surgical site infections can successfully emulate elements of a chronic wound, but these are time consuming and costly, requiring specialized laboratory equipment and considerable space to house study animals. Microfluidic devices however, can be coated with collagen and maintained at basal body temperature, providing a more cost-effective and space-saving model of a chronic wound. Our study assesses the applicability of a new microfluidic model by testing the activity of DispersinB against biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP); DispersinB has been shown to prevent biofilm growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis, another prominent wound colonizer.

Results: We successfully developed a microfluidic model to examine the effects of antimicrobial therapy on biofilms formed by organisms associated with wound infections in companion animals (e.g. MRSP). Although, we were unable to recapitulate previous findings that DispersinB-Gentamycin is highly effective against Staphylococcal biofilms using this model, we were able to confirm its effect in a microtitre plate. Differences in the experimental conditions likely account for this result (e.g. strains tested, flow conditions, treatment time, etc.). In the microtitre plate assay, DispersinB inhibited biofilm growth after a 24 hour period; there was an inverse relationship between the concentration of DispersinB-Gentamycin and the amount of biofilm remaining following treatment. Collagen-coated microtitre plates showed a similar result, but this did not correlate as well; collagen, the most abundant protein in the body may help to retain the biomass of treated biofilms.

Conclusions: Our model may be useful in examining the effect of treatment on wound infections, although we acknowledge that in this model the test organisms may be more recalcitrant to antimicrobials than in other published systems. We contend that this may in fact better represent the conditions in vivo, where organisms associated with chronic wound infections are highly resistant to antimicrobials.

Citing Articles

Electrochemical biosensors on microfluidic chips as promising tools to study microbial biofilms: a review.

Abouhagger A, Celiesiute-Germaniene R, Bakute N, Stirke A, Melo W Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1419570.

PMID: 39386171 PMC: 11462992. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1419570.


Alternatives to animal models to study bacterial infections.

Hu C, Yang W Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2023; 68(5):703-739.

PMID: 37632640 DOI: 10.1007/s12223-023-01084-6.


Bacteriocins Revitalize Non-Effective Penicillin G to Overcome Methicillin-Resistant .

Ovchinnikov K, Kranjec C, Thorstensen T, Carlsen H, Diep D Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 36551348 PMC: 9774949. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11121691.


Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: A Mystery in Search of Better Model Systems.

Murray B, Flores C, Williams C, Flusberg D, Marr E, Kwiatkowska K Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11:691210.

PMID: 34123879 PMC: 8188986. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.691210.


Refining Host-Pathogen Interactions: Organ-on-Chip Side of the Coin.

Baddal B, Marrazzo P Pathogens. 2021; 10(2).

PMID: 33668558 PMC: 7918822. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10020203.


References
1.
Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukic S, Cirkovic I . Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS. 2007; 115(8):891-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x. View

2.
Liu Y, Tay J . Metabolic response of biofilm to shear stress in fixed-film culture. J Appl Microbiol. 2001; 90(3):337-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01244.x. View

3.
Sato K, Sasaki N, Andersson Svahn H, Sato K . Microfluidics for nano-pathophysiology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013; 74:115-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.08.009. View

4.
Bryan J, Frank L, Rohrbach B, Burgette L, Cain C, Bemis D . Treatment outcome of dogs with meticillin-resistant and meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius pyoderma. Vet Dermatol. 2012; 23(4):361-8, e65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01034.x. View

5.
Lee J, Kaplan J, Lee W . Microfluidic devices for studying growth and detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Biomed Microdevices. 2008; 10(4):489-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10544-007-9157-0. View