» Articles » PMID: 24409308

Regional Gray Matter Volume is Associated with Empathizing and Systemizing in Young Adults

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Jan 11
PMID 24409308
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Empathizing is defined as the drive to identify the mental states of others for predicting their behavior and responding with an appropriate emotion. Systemizing is defined as the drive to analyze a system in terms of the rules that govern the system in order to predict its behavior. Using voxel-based morphometry and questionnaires in a large sample of normal, right-handed young adults, we investigated the regional gray matter volume (rGMV) correlates of empathizing and systemizing and additionally those of the D score, which is the difference between systemizing and empathizing, to reveal the comprehensive picture of those correlates. Negative rGMV correlates of empathizing and positive rGMV correlates of the D score (formed by the negative correlation between rGMV and empathizing), were found primarily in nodes in the default mode network, mirror neuron system, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and the lateral part of the prefrontal cortex together with other areas. Positive rGMV correlates of systemizing and of the D score (formed by the positive correlation between rGMV and systemizing) were found primarily in nodes in the external attention system, middle cingulate cortex, and other regions. Negative rGMV correlates of systemizing were found in an area close to the left posterior insula and putamen. These findings reconcile some previously inconsistent findings, provide other new findings and suggest that these areas contribute to empathizing-systemizing. Furthermore, the negative/positive rGMV correlates of empathizing and positive/negative rGMV correlates of systemizing overlapped substantially. This may be in line with the notion that empathizing and systemizing compete neurally in the brain.

Citing Articles

Moral foundations in autistic people and people with systemizing minds.

Greenberg Y, Holt R, Allison C, Smith P, Newman R, Boardman-Pretty T Mol Autism. 2024; 15(1):20.

PMID: 38745228 PMC: 11092219. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-024-00591-8.


A voxel-based morphometry study on gray matter correlates of need for cognition and exploratory information seeking.

Tolomeo S, Lau S, Ragunath B, Setoh P, Esposito G Brain Behav. 2023; 13(9):e3138.

PMID: 37491807 PMC: 10498082. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3138.


Neurobehavioral indices of gaze perception are associated with social cognition across schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.

Blain S, Taylor S, Rutherford S, Lasagna C, Yao B, Angstadt M J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023; 132(6):733-748.

PMID: 37384487 PMC: 10513759. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000846.


Brain structure underlying the empathizing-systemizing difference in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Pan N, Lin L, Wang X, Shi L, Xu X, Jin Y World J Pediatr. 2023; 19(8):782-792.

PMID: 37273174 DOI: 10.1007/s12519-023-00732-8.


Oxytocin-Receptor Gene Modulates Reward-Network Connection and Relationship with Empathy Performance.

Li D, Zhang L, Bai T, Qiu B, Zhu C, Wang K Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023; 16:85-94.

PMID: 36643732 PMC: 9833327. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S370834.


References
1.
Wheelwright S, Baron-Cohen S, Goldenfeld N, Delaney J, Fine D, Smith R . Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ). Brain Res. 2006; 1079(1):47-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.012. View

2.
Nickl-Jockschat T, Habel U, Michel T, Manning J, Laird A, Fox P . Brain structure anomalies in autism spectrum disorder--a meta-analysis of VBM studies using anatomic likelihood estimation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011; 33(6):1470-89. PMC: 4801488. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21299. View

3.
Baron-Cohen S, Richler J, Bisarya D, Gurunathan N, Wheelwright S . The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003; 358(1430):361-74. PMC: 1693117. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1206. View

4.
Wagner D, Kelley W, Heatherton T . Individual differences in the spontaneous recruitment of brain regions supporting mental state understanding when viewing natural social scenes. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 21(12):2788-96. PMC: 3209798. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr074. View

5.
Zhou Y, Wang K, Liu Y, Song M, Song S, Jiang T . Spontaneous brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging as a potential biomarker in neuropsychiatric disorders. Cogn Neurodyn. 2011; 4(4):275-94. PMC: 2974101. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-010-9126-9. View