» Articles » PMID: 24407615

Effect of Soybean Phytoalexins on the Herbivorous Insects Mexican Bean Beetle and Soybean Looper

Overview
Journal J Chem Ecol
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Jan 11
PMID 24407615
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Effects of soybean phytoalexins on the feeding of the soybean looper and Mexican bean beetle were investigated to test the hypothesis that phytoalexins might be a defense mechanism of plants against insects as well as against pathogens. Short-term behavioral responses to the phytoalexins were analyzed using dual-choice tests with phytoalexin-rich and phytoalexin-poor (control) tissues. Phytoalexin production was elicited with ultraviolet radiation. Results from the dual-choice tests indicated that 6th instar soybean looper larvae fed equally on the control and phytoalexin-rich tissues. Feeding by adult and 4th instar Mexican bean beetles, however, was strongly deterred by the phytoalexins as evidenced by "single-bite" mandible scars on the phytoalexin-rich cotyledon discs. Nutritional effects of the isoflavonoid phytoalexin glyceollin on early instar soybean looper larvae were tested by incorporating the phytoalexin into an artificial medium at a level of 1% dry weight (0.15% fresh weight). The larvae were reared for 7 days from emergence on diets of control and glyceollin-containing media. Although survival on the glyceollin diets was initially less than on the control diets, under the experimental conditions glyceollin had no significant effect on the growth, development, or subsequent survival of the larvae. Efficiency of food utilization (ECI) was reduced, indicating that the phytoalexins may be a mild digestibility-reducing factor for the loopers. Implications of the results for host-plant resistance are discussed.

Citing Articles

Ecological interactions, host plant defenses, and control strategies in managing soybean looper, (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Debnath R, George J, Gautam M, Shafi I, Kariyat R, Reddy G Front Insect Sci. 2024; 4:1480940.

PMID: 39726917 PMC: 11669695. DOI: 10.3389/finsc.2024.1480940.


Metabolomics Differences of QTLs Resistant to Soybean Looper.

Yousefi-Taemeh M, Lin J, Ifa D, Parrott W, Kovinich N Metabolites. 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34677425 PMC: 8539317. DOI: 10.3390/metabo11100710.


The Source of -Mediated Resistance to Soybean Aphids Is Located in the Stem.

Joshi K, Baumgardner J, MacPhail M, Acharya S, Blotevogel E, Dayan F Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:689986.

PMID: 34335657 PMC: 8322969. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.689986.


The Influence of Lead on Generation of Signalling Molecules and Accumulation of Flavonoids in Pea Seedlings in Response to Pea Aphid Infestation.

Wozniak A, Drzewiecka K, Kesy J, Marczak L, Narozna D, Grobela M Molecules. 2017; 22(9).

PMID: 28837107 PMC: 6151543. DOI: 10.3390/molecules22091404.


Generalized plant defense: effects on multiple species.

Krischik V, Goth R, Barbosa P Oecologia. 2017; 85(4):562-571.

PMID: 28312504 DOI: 10.1007/BF00323769.


References
1.
Mittler T . Dietary amino acid requirements of the aphid Myzus persicae affected by antibiotic uptake. J Nutr. 1971; 101(8):1023-8. DOI: 10.1093/jn/101.8.1023. View

2.
Akazawa T, Uritani I, Kubota H . Isolation of ipomeamarone and two coumarin derivatives from sweet potato roots injured by the weevil, Cylas formicarius elegantulus. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1960; 88:150-6. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(60)90210-1. View

3.
Whittaker R, Feeny P . Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. Science. 1971; 171(3973):757-70. DOI: 10.1126/science.171.3973.757. View

4.
Mabry T, Ulubelen A . Chemistry and utilization of phenylpropanoids including flavonoids, coumarins, and lignans. J Agric Food Chem. 1980; 28(2):188-95. DOI: 10.1021/jf60228a024. View

5.
Carroll C, Hoffman C . Chemical Feeding Deterrent Mobilized in Response to Insect Herbivory and Counteradaptation by Epilachna tredecimnotata. Science. 1980; 209(4454):414-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.209.4454.414. View