» Articles » PMID: 24407422

Structural Analysis of Asparaginyl Endopeptidase Reveals the Activation Mechanism and a Reversible Intermediate Maturation Stage

Overview
Journal Cell Res
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2014 Jan 11
PMID 24407422
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Asparaginyl endopeptidase (AEP) is an endo/lysosomal cysteine endopeptidase with a preference for an asparagine residue at the P1 site and plays an important role in the maturation of toll-like receptors 3/7/9. AEP is known to undergo autoproteolytic maturation at acidic pH for catalytic activation. Here, we describe crystal structures of the AEP proenzyme and the mature forms of AEP. Structural comparisons between AEP and caspases revealed similarities in the composition of key residues and in the catalytic mechanism. Mutagenesis studies identified N44, R46, H150, E189, C191, S217/S218 and D233 as residues that are essential for the cleavage of the peptide substrate. During maturation, autoproteolytic cleavage of AEP's cap domain opens up access to the active site on the core domain. Unexpectedly, an intermediate autoproteolytic maturation stage was discovered at approximately pH 4.5 in which the partially activated AEP could be reversed back to its proenzyme form. This unique feature was confirmed by the crystal structure of AEPpH4.5 (AEP was matured at pH 4.5 and crystallized at pH 8.5), in which the broken peptide bonds were religated and the structure was transformed back to its proenzyme form. Additionally, the AEP inhibitor cystatin C could be digested by the fully activated AEP, but could not be digested by activated cathepsins. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time that cystatins may regulate the activity of AEP through substrate competition for the active site.

Citing Articles

HIF2α drives ccRCC metastasis through transcriptional activation of methylation-controlled J protein and enhanced prolegumain secretion.

Shen T, Su Y, Wang D, Li G, Liu X, Sun C Cell Death Dis. 2025; 16(1):93.

PMID: 39948060 PMC: 11825665. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-025-07432-3.


Asparagine endopeptidase regulates lysosome homeostasis via modulating endomembrane phosphoinositide composition.

Yao L, Zi G, He M, Xu Y, Wang L, Peng B Cell Death Dis. 2025; 15(12):883.

PMID: 39743643 PMC: 11693757. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-024-07187-3.


Murine Models of Secondary Cytokine Storm Syndromes.

Brisse E, Verweyen E, De Visscher A, Kessel C, Wouters C, Matthys P Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024; 1448:497-522.

PMID: 39117836 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-59815-9_34.


Netrin-1 signaling pathway mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases.

Zhu K, Wang H, Ye K, Chen G, Zhang Z Neural Regen Res. 2024; 20(4):960-972.

PMID: 38989931 PMC: 11438344. DOI: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-23-01573.


Norepinephrine Drives Sleep Fragmentation Activation of Asparagine Endopeptidase, Locus Ceruleus Degeneration, and Hippocampal Amyloid-β Accumulation.

Zhang K, Zhu Y, Fenik P, Fleysh D, Ly C, Thomas S J Neurosci. 2024; 44(28).

PMID: 38830763 PMC: 11236578. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-23.2024.


References
1.
Saska I, Gillon A, Hatsugai N, Dietzgen R, Hara-Nishimura I, Anderson M . An asparaginyl endopeptidase mediates in vivo protein backbone cyclization. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282(40):29721-8. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M705185200. View

2.
Chen J, Fortunato M, Barrett A . Activation of human prolegumain by cleavage at a C-terminal asparagine residue. Biochem J. 2000; 352 Pt 2:327-34. PMC: 1221463. View

3.
Dall E, Brandstetter H . Mechanistic and structural studies on legumain explain its zymogenicity, distinct activation pathways, and regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(27):10940-5. PMC: 3703970. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300686110. View

4.
Ewald S, Lee B, Lau L, Wickliffe K, Shi G, Chapman H . The ectodomain of Toll-like receptor 9 is cleaved to generate a functional receptor. Nature. 2008; 456(7222):658-62. PMC: 2596276. DOI: 10.1038/nature07405. View

5.
Murshudov G, Vagin A, Dodson E . Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1997; 53(Pt 3):240-55. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. View