» Articles » PMID: 24404555

Registration of Clinical Trials: Is It Really Needed?

Overview
Journal N Am J Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Jan 10
PMID 24404555
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Withholding findings of clinical trials for publication or presentation to the regulatory authorities is a major concern. We aimed to address the importance of clinical trial registration and whether it is needed or not.

Discussion: For ethical conduct of clinical trial, registration is an important but debatable issue due to proprietary interest of the pharmaceutical industry. Over the years, investigating agencies uncovered several instances of misconduct during the clinical trial. The International committee of medical journal editors requires registration of trial methodology, but does not require registration of trial results; however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Amendments does require researchers to register results.

Conclusion: Prospective registration of clinical trial is mandatory for more transparent research and sustaining the validity of evidence based practice and availability of reliable data. Clinical trials registration has the potential to contribute substantially to improve clinical trial transparency and reducing publication bias and selective reporting.

Citing Articles

Assessing the landscape of clinical and observational trials involving bioprinting: a scoping review.

Briones Y, Pascua B, Tiangco N, Crisostomo I, Casiguran S, Remenyi R 3D Print Med. 2025; 11(1):5.

PMID: 39961914 PMC: 11834296. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-025-00253-2.


Discordant Information on Blinding in Trial Registries and Published Research: A Systematic Review.

Zhang F, Zhu Y, Zhao S, Zhang Q, Tao H, Wu Y JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(12):e2452274.

PMID: 39724369 PMC: 11672156. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52274.


Completeness of intervention reporting of nutrition-focused weight management interventions adjunct to metabolic and bariatric surgery: effect of the TIDieR checklist.

Ben-Porat T, Yousefi R, Stojanovic J, Boucher V, Fortin A, Lavoie K Int J Obes (Lond). 2024; 48(7):901-912.

PMID: 38459257 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-024-01506-6.


Nature of the evidence base and approaches to guide nutrition interventions for individuals: a position paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences.

Hickson M, Papoutsakis C, Madden A, Smith M, Whelan K Br J Nutr. 2024; 131(10):1754-1773.

PMID: 38305040 PMC: 11074602. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114524000291.


A review of clinical trials registered in India from 2008 to 2022 to describe the first-in-human trials.

Sabu S, Venkatraman S, Cherian J, Das S, Pahuja M, Adhikari T Perspect Clin Res. 2024; 15(1):18-23.

PMID: 38282636 PMC: 10810051. DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_124_23.


References
1.
Claxton L . Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?. Mutat Res. 2005; 589(1):17-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003. View

2.
Willyard C . Pfizer lawsuit spotlights ethics of developing world clinical trials. Nat Med. 2007; 13(7):763. DOI: 10.1038/nm0707-763. View

3.
. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011; 1(1):42-58. PMC: 3142758. View

4.
Martinson B, Anderson M, De Vries R . Scientists behaving badly. Nature. 2005; 435(7043):737-8. DOI: 10.1038/435737a. View

5.
Juni P, Nartey L, Reichenbach S, Sterchi R, Dieppe P, Egger M . Risk of cardiovascular events and rofecoxib: cumulative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2004; 364(9450):2021-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17514-4. View