» Articles » PMID: 24404277

The Writing Retreat: a High-yield Clinical Faculty Development Opportunity in Academic Writing

Overview
Journal J Grad Med Educ
Date 2014 Jan 10
PMID 24404277
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The need for consistent academic productivity challenges junior clinician-scholars, who often lack the aptitude to ensure efficient production of manuscripts.

Intervention: To solve this problem, an academic division of a major medical center developed an off-site writing retreat. The purpose of the retreat was not to teach writing skills, but to offer senior mentor assistance with a focus on the elements of manuscript writing.

Methods: The retreat paired senior faculty members with junior staff. Senior faculty identified manuscript topics and provided real-time writing and editing supervision. Team-building exercises, midcourse corrections, and debriefing interviews were built into the retreat. The number of manuscripts and grant proposals generated during the 2008-2011 retreats was recorded, and the program was evaluated by using unstructured debriefing interviews.

Results: An average of 6 to 7 faculty members and fellows participated in each retreat. During the past 4 years, participants produced an average of 3 grant proposals and 7 manuscripts per retreat. After the writing retreat, each fellow and junior faculty member produced an average of 4 scholarly products per year, compared to fewer than 2 for prior years' retreats. Participant feedback indicated the success of the retreat resulted from protected time, direct mentorship by the scholars involved, and pairing of authors, which allows for rapid production of manuscripts and accelerated the editing process. More than 80% of mentors returned each year to participate.

Conclusions: The writing retreat is a feasible, effective strategy to increase scholarship among faculty, acceptable to mentees and mentors, and sustainable over time.

Citing Articles

A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials.

Hohlfeld A, Kredo T, Clarke M Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):310.

PMID: 39707441 PMC: 11660680. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5.


Granting access: Development of a formal course to demystify and promote predoctoral fellowship applications for graduate students.

Geyer P, Hoffmann D, Barr J, Widmayer H, Blaumueller C PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0301480.

PMID: 38669240 PMC: 11051599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301480.


Highlighting common pitfalls to avoid when writing the medical education manuscript.

Ligon B, Turner T, Thammasitboon S MedEdPublish (2016). 2024; 6:94.

PMID: 38406396 PMC: 10885260. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2017.000094.


Faculty writing groups: The impact of protected writing time and group support.

Kwan P, Sharp S, Mason S, Saetermoe C Int J Educ Res Open. 2022; 2.

PMID: 35199058 PMC: 8863135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100100.


Scientific Writing Workshop Improves Confidence in Critical Writing Skills among Trainees in the Biomedical Sciences.

Wortman-Wunder E, Wefes I J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2020; 21(1).

PMID: 32148607 PMC: 7048399. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.1843.


References
1.
Pololi L, Knight S, Dunn K . Facilitating scholarly writing in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19(1):64-8. PMC: 1494689. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21143.x. View

2.
Chapman A, Guay-Woodford L . Nurturing passion in a time of academic climate change: the modern-day challenge of junior faculty development. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3(6):1878-83. PMC: 4653761. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04240808. View

3.
Steinert Y, McLeod P, Liben S, Snell L . Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group. Med Teach. 2008; 30(8):e280-5. DOI: 10.1080/01421590802337120. View

4.
Ruiz J, Candler C, Qadri S, Roos B . E-learning as evidence of educational scholarship: a survey of chairs of promotion and tenure committees at U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2009; 84(1):47-57. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181901004. View

5.
Shah J, Shah A, Pietrobon R . Scientific writing of novice researchers: what difficulties and encouragements do they encounter?. Acad Med. 2009; 84(4):511-6. PMC: 6035752. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8c3c. View