Beliefs and Practice Patterns in Spinal Manipulation and Spinal Motion Palpation Reported by Canadian Manipulative Physiotherapists

Overview

Journal Physiother Can

Specialty Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2014 Jan 10

PMID 24403681

Citations 10

Authors

Lisa C Carlesso

Joy C MacDermid

P Lina Santaguida

Lehana Thabane

Kevin Giulekas

Leo Larocque

James Millard

Caitlin Williams

Jack Miller

Bert M Chesworth

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: This practice survey describes how Fellows of the Canadian Academy of Manipulative Physiotherapy (FCAMPT) use spinal manipulation and mobilization and how they perceive their competence in performing spinal assessment; it also quantifies relationships between clinical experience and use of spinal manipulation.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was designed based on input from experts and the literature was administered to a random sample of the FCAMPT mailing list. Descriptive (including frequencies) and inferential statistical analyses (including linear regression) were performed.

Results: The response rate was 82% (278/338 eligible FCAMPTs). Most (99%) used spinal manipulation. Two-thirds (62%) used clinical presentation as a factor when deciding to mobilize or manipulate. The least frequently manipulated spinal region was the cervical spine (2% of patients); 60% felt that cervical manipulation generated more adverse events. Increased experience was associated with increased use of upper cervical manipulation among male respondents (14% more often for every 10 years after certification; β, 95% CI=1.37, 0.89-1.85, p<0.001) but not among female respondents. Confidence in palpation accuracy decreased in lower regions of the spine.

Conclusion: The use of spinal manipulation/mobilization is prevalent among FCAMPTs, but is less commonly used in the neck because of a perceived association with adverse events.

Citing Articles

Beliefs and practice patterns of spinal thrust manipulation for mechanical low back pain of physical therapists in the state of Minnesota.

Kuik M, Calley D, Buus R, Hollman J J Man Manip Ther. 2023; 32(4):421-428.

PMID: 37941306 PMC: 11257004. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2279821.

Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of spinal manipulation: a cross-sectional survey of Italian physiotherapists.

Mourad F, Stella Yousif M, Maselli F, Pellicciari L, Meroni R, Dunning J Chiropr Man Therap. 2022; 30(1):38.

PMID: 36096835 PMC: 9465888. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00449-x.

Incomplete reporting of manual therapy interventions and a lack of clinician and setting diversity in clinical trials for neck pain limits replication and real-world translation. A scoping review.

Leech J, Owen W, Young J, Rhon D J Man Manip Ther. 2022; 31(3):153-161.

PMID: 36047903 PMC: 10288932. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2113295.

Assessing Cranial Nerves in Physical Therapy Practice: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey and Implication for Clinical Practice.

Mourad F, Lopez G, Cataldi F, Maselli F, Pellicciari L, Salomon M Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(10).

PMID: 34682942 PMC: 8535196. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9101262.

Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review.

Zadro J, OKeeffe M, Maher C BMJ Open. 2019; 9(10):e032329.

PMID: 31591090 PMC: 6797428. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032329.

References

Rothwell D, Bondy S, Williams J . Chiropractic manipulation and stroke: a population-based case-control study. Stroke. 2001; 32(5):1054-60. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1054. View

Hurley L, Yardley K, Gross A, Hendry L, McLaughlin L . A survey to examine attitudes and patterns of practice of physiotherapists who perform cervical spine manipulation. Man Ther. 2002; 7(1):10-8. DOI: 10.1054/math.2001.0430. View

Carlesso L, Gross A, Santaguida P, Burnie S, Voth S, Sadi J . Adverse events associated with the use of cervical manipulation and mobilization for the treatment of neck pain in adults: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010; 15(5):434-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2010.02.006. View

Dunning J, Cleland J, Waldrop M, Arnot C, Young I, Turner M . Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 42(1):5-18. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3894. View

Carlesso L, MacDermid J, Santaguida L . Standardization of adverse event terminology and reporting in orthopaedic physical therapy: application to the cervical spine. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 40(8):455-63. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3229. View

Cagnie B, Vinck E, Beernaert A, Cambier D . How common are side effects of spinal manipulation and can these side effects be predicted?. Man Ther. 2004; 9(3):151-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2004.03.001. View

Najm W, Seffinger M, Mishra S, Dickerson V, Adams A, Reinsch S . Content validity of manual spinal palpatory exams - A systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2003; 3:1. PMC: 156889. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-3-1. View

Carnes D, Mars T, Mullinger B, Froud R, Underwood M . Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010; 15(4):355-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.006. View

Abbott J, Flynn T, Fritz J, Hing W, Reid D, Whitman J . Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity. Man Ther. 2007; 14(1):36-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2007.09.011. View

10.

Michaeli A . Reported occurrence and nature of complications following manipulative physiotherapy in South Africa. Aust J Physiother. 2014; 39(4):309-15. DOI: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60491-8. View

11.

Grant T, Niere K . Techniques used by manipulative physiotherapists in the management of headaches. Aust J Physiother. 2001; 46(3):215-222. DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60330-5. View

12.

Gross A, Haines T, Goldsmith C, Santaguida L, McLaughlin L, Peloso P . Knowledge to action: a challenge for neck pain treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39(5):351-63. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2831. View

13.

Adams G, Sim J . A survey of UK manual therapists' practice of and attitudes towards manipulation and its complications. Physiother Res Int. 1998; 3(3):206-27. DOI: 10.1002/pri.141. View

14.

DSylva J, Miller J, Gross A, Burnie S, Goldsmith C, Graham N . Manual therapy with or without physical medicine modalities for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010; 15(5):415-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2010.04.003. View

15.

van Trijffel E, Oostendorp R, Lindeboom R, Bossuyt P, Lucas C . Perceptions and use of passive intervertebral motion assessment of the spine: a survey among physiotherapists specializing in manual therapy. Man Ther. 2008; 14(3):243-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2008.02.005. View

16.

Cook C, Hegedus E, Showalter C, Sizer Jr P . Coupling behavior of the cervical spine: a systematic review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006; 29(7):570-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.020. View

17.

Jull G, Trott P, Potter H, Zito G, Niere K, Shirley D . A randomized controlled trial of exercise and manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(17):1835-43; discussion 1843. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00004. View

18.

Cross K, Kuenze C, Grindstaff T, Hertel J . Thoracic spine thrust manipulation improves pain, range of motion, and self-reported function in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41(9):633-42. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3670. View

19.

MacDermid J, Chesworth B, Patterson S, Roth J . Validity of pain and motion indicators recorded on a movement diagram of shoulder lateral rotation. Aust J Physiother. 2001; 45(4):269-277. DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60356-1. View

20.

Sizer Jr P, Brismee J, Cook C . Coupling behavior of the thoracic spine: a systematic review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007; 30(5):390-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.04.009. View