» Articles » PMID: 24402649

The Role of Social and Intergenerational Equity in Making Changes in Human Well-being Sustainable

Overview
Journal Ambio
Date 2014 Jan 10
PMID 24402649
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A sustainable world is one in which human needs are met equitably and without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Human well-being is described by four primary elements-basic human needs, economic needs, environmental needs, and subjective well-being. These elements can interact in a myriad of ways to influence overall well-being. What makes changes in human well-being sustainable for a population or a nation? Two major interactional concepts can push changes in human well-being toward a sustainable state in space and time-social equity and intergenerational equity. The concept of social equity distributes well-being over space, ensuring the fair treatment of all members of society promoting spatial sustainability of a well-being decision. The concept of intergenerational equity distributes well-being through time, ensuring the well-being of present and future generations of a population or nation, promoting temporal sustainability of a well-being decision. The roles of social and intergenerational equity in terms of their influence on human well-being are examined with a focus on more sustainable decision-making.

Citing Articles

We Are Concerned about the Future and We Are Here to Support the Change: Let's Talk and Work Together!.

Branquinho C, Xavier L, Andrade C, Ferreira T, Noronha C, Wainwright T Children (Basel). 2022; 9(10).

PMID: 36291510 PMC: 9600870. DOI: 10.3390/children9101574.


Investigating the relationship between environmental quality, socio-spatial segregation and the social dimension of sustainability in US urban areas.

Buck K, Summers J, Smith L Sustain Cities Soc. 2022; 67(102732):1-11.

PMID: 35340221 PMC: 8943821. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102732.

References
1.
Williams A . Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument. Health Econ. 1997; 6(2):117-32. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199703)6:2<117::aid-hec256>3.0.co;2-b. View

2.
Stahl C, Bridges T . "Fully baked" sustainability using decision analytic principles and ecosystem services. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013; 9(4):551-3. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1470. View

3.
Kuo F, Faber Taylor A . A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a national study. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(9):1580-6. PMC: 1448497. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.9.1580. View

4.
Maroko A, Maantay J, Sohler N, Grady K, Arno P . The complexities of measuring access to parks and physical activity sites in New York City: a quantitative and qualitative approach. Int J Health Geogr. 2009; 8:34. PMC: 2708147. DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-34. View

5.
Frumkin H, Hess J, Luber G, Malilay J, McGeehin M . Climate change: the public health response. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(3):435-45. PMC: 2253589. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.119362. View