Prognostic Value of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes on Residual Disease After Primary Chemotherapy for Triple-negative Breast Cancer: a Retrospective Multicenter Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: There is a need to develop surrogates for treatment efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting to speed-up drug development and stratify patients according to outcome. Preclinical studies showed that chemotherapy induces an antitumor immune response. In order to develop new surrogates for drug efficacy, we assessed the prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) on residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Patients And Methods: Three hundred four TNBC patients with residual disease after NACT were retrospectively identified in three different hospitals. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from surgical postchemotherapy specimens were evaluated for intratumoral (It-TIL) and stromal (Str-TIL) TIL. Cases were classified as High-TIL if It-TIL and/or Str-TIL >60%.
Results: TIL were assessable for 278 cases. Continuous It-TIL and Str-TIL variables were strong prognostic factors in the multivariate model, both for metastasis-free [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.96, P = 0.01 and HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.98, P = 0.02 for Str-TIL and It-TIL, respectively] and overall survival (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.97, P = 0.01 and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99, P = 0.03 for Str-TIL and It-TIL, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rate was 91% (95% CI 68% to 97%) for High-TIL patients (n = 27) and 55% (95% CI 48% to 61%) for Low-TIL patients (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.61, log-rank P = 0.0017). The major prognostic impact of TIL was seen for patients with large tumor burden following NACT (residual tumor >2 cm and/or node metastasis). In all but one High-TIL case, It-TIL and Str-TIL values were lower on the prechemotherapy sample.
Conclusions: The presence of TIL in residual disease after NACT is associated with better prognosis in TNBC patients. This parameter may represent a new surrogate of drug efficacy to test investigational agents in the neoadjuvant setting and a new prognostic marker to select patients at high risk of relapse.
Rajesh A, Gurusamy D, Manikkam R Cureus. 2025; 17(3):e80258.
PMID: 40061852 PMC: 11890627. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.80258.
Goel B, Virmani T, Jain V, Kumar G, Sharma A, Al Noman A Biomed Res Int. 2024; 2024:5594542.
PMID: 39574432 PMC: 11581800. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5594542.
Single-cell transcriptional atlas of human breast cancers and model systems.
Altman J, Olex A, Zboril E, Walker C, Boyd D, Myrick R Clin Transl Med. 2024; 14(10):e70044.
PMID: 39417215 PMC: 11483560. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70044.
Li L, Li Y Balkan Med J. 2024; 41(6):469-475.
PMID: 39324418 PMC: 11589214. DOI: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2024.2024-7-26.
On-treatment biopsies to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Sinn B, Sychra K, Untch M, Karn T, van Mackelenbergh M, Huober J Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):138.
PMID: 39317942 PMC: 11423510. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01883-w.