» Articles » PMID: 24395987

The Effects of Expression: How Providing Emotional Support Online Improves Cancer Patients' Coping Strategies

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Jan 8
PMID 24395987
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Emotional support has traditionally been conceived as something a breast cancer patient receives. However, this framework may obscure a more complex process, facilitated by the emerging social media environment, which includes the effects of composing and sending messages to others. Accordingly, this study explores the effects of expression and reception of emotional support messages in online groups and the importance of bonding as a mediator influencing the coping strategies of breast cancer patients.

Methods: Data were collected as part of two National Cancer Institute-funded randomized clinical trials. Eligible subjects were within 2 months of diagnosis of primary breast cancer or recurrence. Expression and reception of emotionally supportive messages were tracked and coded for 237 breast cancer patients. Analysis resulted from merging 1) computer-aided content analysis of discussion posts, 2) action log analysis of system use, and 3) longitudinal survey data.

Results: As expected, perceived bonding was positively related to all four coping strategies (active coping: β = 0.251, P = .000; positive reframing: β = 0.288, P = .000; planning: β = 0.213, P = .006; humor: β = 0.159, P = .009). More importantly, expression (γ = 0.138, P = .027), but not reception (γ = -0.018, P = .741), of emotional support increases perceived bonding, which in turn mediates the effects on patients' positive coping strategies.

Conclusions: There is increasing importance for scholars to distinguish the effects of expression from reception to understand the processes involved in producing psychosocial benefits. This study shows that emotional support is more than something cancer patients receive; it is part of an active, complex process that can be facilitated by social media.

Citing Articles

mHealth Engagement for Antiretroviral Medication Adherence Among People With HIV and Substance Use Disorders: Observational Study.

Mi R, Yang E, Tahk A, Tarfa A, Cotter L, Lu L J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26():e57774.

PMID: 39705693 PMC: 11699505. DOI: 10.2196/57774.


With a little help from my friends: Social support, hope and climate change engagement.

Geiger N, Swim J, Fraser J Br J Soc Psychol. 2024; 64(1):e12837.

PMID: 39655783 PMC: 11629609. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12837.


Using Machine Learning of Online Expression to Explain Recovery Trajectories: Content Analytic Approach to Studying a Substance Use Disorder Forum.

Yang E, Kornfield R, Liu Y, Chih M, Sarma P, Gustafson D J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45589.

PMID: 37606984 PMC: 10481212. DOI: 10.2196/45589.


Digital Care Horizon: A Framework for Extending Health Care Through Digital Transformation.

Philpot L, Dugani S, Singla A, DeZutter M, Ebbert J Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023; 1(3):210-216.

PMID: 37601768 PMC: 10435276. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.05.005.


Do Informational and Emotional Elements Differ between Online Psychological and Physiological Disease Communities in China? A Comparative Study of Depression and Diabetes.

Yao Z, Ni Z, Zhang B, Du J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(4).

PMID: 35206355 PMC: 8872467. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042167.


References
1.
Namkoong K, Shah D, Han J, Kim S, Yoo W, Fan D . Expression and reception of treatment information in breast cancer support groups: how health self-efficacy moderates effects on emotional well-being. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81 Suppl:S41-7. PMC: 2993816. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.009. View

2.
Carver C . You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4(1):92-100. DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6. View

3.
Liao M, Chen P, Chen M, Chen S . Effect of supportive care on the anxiety of women with suspected breast cancer. J Adv Nurs. 2009; 66(1):49-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05139.x. View

4.
Baker T, Hawkins R, Pingree S, Roberts L, McDowell H, Shaw B . Optimizing eHealth breast cancer interventions: which types of eHealth services are effective?. Transl Behav Med. 2011; 1(1):134-145. PMC: 3119549. DOI: 10.1007/s13142-010-0004-0. View

5.
Lutgendorf S, Sood A, Antoni M . Host factors and cancer progression: biobehavioral signaling pathways and interventions. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(26):4094-9. PMC: 2940426. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.9357. View