» Articles » PMID: 24395922

Gene Mutations Versus Clinically Relevant Phenotypes: Lyso-Gb3 Defines Fabry Disease

Overview
Date 2014 Jan 8
PMID 24395922
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Currently, no method is available to identify α-galactosidase A (agalA) mutations determining clinically relevant Fabry disease. In our largest European Fabry cohort, we investigated whether a biomarker, specific for the defect, could stratify persons at risk.

Methods And Results: A total of 124 individuals with agalA mutations were investigated with a comprehensive clinical workup, genetic analysis, and laboratory testing, including measurements of agalA activity and lyso-Gb3 (degradation product of the accumulating Gb3). Additionally, an extensive family screening with a clinical workup of relatives was performed. The patient population was divided into 2 samples: previously described mutations (n=72) and novel mutations (n=52). The patients with previously described mutations were subdivided into 2 groups: classical mutations, which were known to cause the classic type of Fabry disease with specific symptoms and a high risk for major events in all 3 main organs (heart, kidney, and central nervous system), and atypical mutations without the typical presentation. All patients with atypical mutations (n=17) had lower lyso-Gb3 levels than any of the patients with classical Fabry disease (n=55). A cutoff value of 2.7 ng/mL separated the 2 groups. Six out of 52 patients with novel mutations showed a lyso-Gb3 level <2.7 ng/mL. Clinical investigation, blinded to lyso-Gb3 results, revealed no classic organ involvement in these patients or their relatives. In contrast, the characterization of patients with lyso-Gb3≥2.7 ng/mL suggested classical Fabry mutations in most of the patients (93%).

Conclusions: Our data show that the biomarker lyso-Gb3 may identify the clinically relevant agalA mutations leading to Fabry disease.

Citing Articles

Effects of Current Therapies on Disease Progression in Fabry Disease: A Narrative Review for Better Patient Management in Clinical Practice.

Mignani R, Biagini E, Cianci V, Pieruzzi F, Pisani A, Tuttolomondo A Adv Ther. 2024; 42(2):597-635.

PMID: 39636569 PMC: 11787255. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-03041-2.


Infrared spectroscopy as a new approach for early fabry disease screening: a pilot study.

Barretto C, Nascimento M, Brun B, da Silva T, Dias P, Silva C Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024; 19(1):373.

PMID: 39390597 PMC: 11466028. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03380-x.


2024 Update of the TSOC Expert Consensus of Fabry Disease.

Hung C, Wu Y, Kuo L, Sung K, Lin H, Chang W Acta Cardiol Sin. 2024; 40(5):544-568.

PMID: 39308653 PMC: 11413953. DOI: 10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240731A.


Molecular biomarkers, network biomarkers, and dynamic network biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of rare diseases.

Tang S, Yuan K, Chen L Fundam Res. 2024; 2(6):894-902.

PMID: 38933388 PMC: 11197705. DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.07.011.


Late-onset renal variant Fabry disease with R112H mutation and mild increase in plasma globotriaosylsphingosine: a case report.

Tanaka K, Sugiyama H, Morinaga H, Onishi A, Tanabe K, Uchida H Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1383309.

PMID: 38903807 PMC: 11187088. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1383309.