A Prospective Study of the Association Between the Readiness for Return to Work Scale and Future Work Participation in Norway

Overview

Journal J Occup Rehabil

Publisher Springer

Specialties Occupational Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2014 Jan 8

PMID 24395042

Citations 4

Authors

Tore N Braathen

Soren Brage

Gunnar Tellnes

Oyeflaten Irene

Jensen Chris

Monica Eftedal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the associations between the Norwegian version of the Readiness for return to work (RTW) scale and future work participation among persons in inpatient occupational rehabilitation.

Methods: A prospective cohort with one year follow up. The participants (n = 179) were persons with reduced work ability who participated in a one-week inpatient rehabilitation program. Four readiness for RTW factors were identified at baseline using explorative factor analysis: 'RTW inability' and 'RTW uncertainty' among persons not working, and 'uncertain work maintenance' and 'proactive work maintenance' among persons working. Work participation was measured as days without sickness benefits in the year following the rehabilitation program. The associations between work participation and readiness for RTW factors were analyzed in multivariate linear regression models controlling for gender, age, subjective health complaints, employment status and previous sickness benefit.

Results: High scores on the RTW inability factor were associated with low future work participation among persons not working before the rehabilitation program. Among persons working before the program, the proactive work maintenance factor was associated with high future work participation. Neither the RTW uncertainty factor nor the uncertain work maintenance factor was associated with future work participation.

Conclusions: The associations between two readiness for RTW factors (RTW inability and proactive work maintenance) and future work participation indicate that these factors can be used as screening tools to tailor occupational rehabilitation programs.

Citing Articles

Exploring the status and associated factors of the readiness for return-to-work in young and middle-aged stroke patients.

Liu Z, Li J, Liu F, Guan N, Li Y, Zhang Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2841.

PMID: 38310121 PMC: 10838315. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53262-2.

Psychometric properties of the readiness for return to work scale in occupational rehabilitation in South Korea.

Lee J, Kim S, Shin G, Yoo S, Leigh J BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):39.

PMID: 36609278 PMC: 9817403. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14948-2.

Development of employment indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation care: SCI-High Project.

Alavinia S, Jetha A, Hitzig S, McCauley D, Routhier F, Noonan V J Spinal Cord Med. 2021; 44(sup1):S118-S133.

PMID: 34779730 PMC: 8604534. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1955205.

Associations Between the Readiness for Return to Work Scale and Return to Work: A Prospective Study.

Aasdahl L, Pape K, Jensen C, Vasseljen O, Braathen T, Johnsen R J Occup Rehabil. 2017; 28(1):97-106.

PMID: 28299536 PMC: 5820391. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9705-2.

References

Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk F, van der Klink J . Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2012; 23(2):290-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9389-6. View

Stover M, Pape K, Johnsen R, Fleten N, Sund E, Claussen B . Unemployment and disability pension--an 18-year follow-up study of a 40-year-old population in a Norwegian county. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:148. PMC: 3305666. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-148. View

Braathen T, Brage S, Tellnes G, Eftedal M . Psychometric properties of the readiness for return to work scale in inpatient occupational rehabilitation in Norway. J Occup Rehabil. 2012; 23(3):371-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9414-9. View

Lydell M, Grahn B, Mansson J, Baigi A, Marklund B . Predictive factors of sustained return to work for persons with musculoskeletal disorders who participated in rehabilitation. Work. 2009; 33(3):317-28. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0879. View

Lagerveld S, Bultmann U, Franche R, van Dijk F, Vlasveld M, van der Feltz-Cornelis C . Factors associated with work participation and work functioning in depressed workers: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2010; 20(3):275-92. PMC: 2923705. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9224-x. View

Eriksen H, Ihlebaek C, Ursin H . A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC). Scand J Public Health. 2000; 27(1):63-72. View

Reiso H, Nygard J, Jorgensen G, Holanger R, Soldal D, Bruusgaard D . Back to work: predictors of return to work among patients with back disorders certified as sick: a two-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(13):1468-73; discussion 1473-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067089.83472.1F. View

Steenstra I, Ibrahim S, Franche R, Hogg-Johnson S, Shaw W, Pransky G . Validation of a risk factor-based intervention strategy model using data from the readiness for return to work cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009; 20(3):394-405. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9218-8. View

Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek J, de Boer A, Blonk R, van Dijk F . Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006; 32(1):67-74. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.978. View

10.

Shaw W, Reme S, Linton S, Huang Y, Pransky G . 3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire--psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011; 37(2):109-19. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3139. View

11.

Schultz I, Crook J, Meloche G, BERKOWITZ J, Milner R, Zuberbier O . Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004; 107(1-2):77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.019. View

12.

Kerns R, Rosenberg R, Jamison R, Caudill M, Haythornthwaite J . Readiness to adopt a self-management approach to chronic pain: the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ). Pain. 1997; 72(1-2):227-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00038-9. View

13.

Cole D, Mondloch M, Hogg-Johnson S . Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes--a prospective study. CMAJ. 2002; 166(6):749-54. PMC: 99453. View

14.

Oyeflaten I, Lie S, Ihlebaek C, Eriksen H . Multiple transitions in sick leave, disability benefits, and return to work. - A 4-year follow-up of patients participating in a work-related rehabilitation program. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:748. PMC: 3490737. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-748. View

15.

Reiso H, Nygard J, Brage S, Gulbrandsen P, Tellnes G . Work ability and duration of certified sickness absence. Scand J Public Health. 2001; 29(3):218-25. View

16.

Roelen C, Koopmans P, Groothoff J . Subjective health complaints in relation to sickness absence. Work. 2010; 37(1):15-21. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1052. View

17.

Iles R, Davidson M, Taylor N . Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2008; 65(8):507-17. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.036046. View

18.

Stewart A, Polak E, Young R, Schultz I . Injured workers' construction of expectations of return to work with sub-acute back pain: the role of perceived uncertainty. J Occup Rehabil. 2011; 22(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-011-9312-6. View

19.

Cornelius L, van der Klink J, Groothoff J, Brouwer S . Prognostic factors of long term disability due to mental disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2010; 21(2):259-74. PMC: 3098343. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-010-9261-5. View

20.

Audhoe S, Hoving J, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Friperson R, de Jong P, Sluiter J . Prognostic factors for the work participation of sick-listed unemployed and temporary agency workers with psychological problems. J Occup Rehabil. 2012; 22(4):437-46. PMC: 3484312. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9358-0. View