» Articles » PMID: 24392317

Isolated Small Bowel Transplantation Outcomes and the Impact of Immunosuppressants: Experience of a Single Transplant Center

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2014 Jan 7
PMID 24392317
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To investigate patient and graft outcomes in isolated small bowel transplant (SBTx) recipients and immunosuppressant induction agent impact on outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of the perioperative data of patients who underwent SBTx transplant during an 8-year period was conducted. The intraoperative data were: patient demographics, etiology of short gut syndrome, hemodynamic parameters, coagulation profiles, intraoperative fluid and blood products transfused, and development of post-reperfusion. The postoperative data were: hospital/intensive care unit stays, duration of mechanical ventilation, postoperative incidence of acute kidney injury, and 1-year patient and graft outcomes. The effects of the three immunosuppressant induction agents (Zenapax, Thymoglobulin, Campath) on patient and graft outcomes were reviewed.

Results: During the 8-year period there were 77 patients; 1-year patient and graft survival were 95% and 86% respectively. Sixteen patients received Zenapax, 22 received Thymoglobulin, and 39 received Campath without effects on patient or graft survival (P = 0.90, P = 0.14, respectively). The use of different immune induction agents did not affect the incidence of rejection and infection during the first 90 postoperative days (P = 0.072, P = 0.29, respectively). The Zenapax group received more intraoperative fluid and blood products and were coagulopathic at the end of surgery. Zenapax and Thymoglobulin significantly increased serum creatinine at 48 h (P = 0.023) and 1 wk (P = 0.001) post-transplant, but none developed renal failure or required dialysis at the end of the first year.

Conclusion: One-year patient and graft survival were 95% and 86%, respectively. The use of different immunosuppressant induction agents may affect the intraoperative course and short-term postoperative morbidities, but not 1-year patient and graft outcomes.

References
1.
Castelli R, Gritti G, Cannavo A, Moreo G, Conti G, Reda G . Successful management with intravenous immunoglobulins in alemtuzumab-induced acute inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy: clinical report of three patients. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2012; 34(4):717-20. DOI: 10.3109/08923973.2011.644295. View

2.
Pironi L, Joly F, Forbes A, Colomb V, Lyszkowska M, Baxter J . Long-term follow-up of patients on home parenteral nutrition in Europe: implications for intestinal transplantation. Gut. 2010; 60(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.223255. View

3.
Trevizol A, David A, Dias E, Mantovani D, Pecora R, Dalbuquerque L . Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation immunosuppression protocols--literature review. Transplant Proc. 2012; 44(8):2445-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.016. View

4.
OKeefe S, El Hajj I, Wu T, Martin D, Mohammed K, Abu-Elmagd K . Endoscopic evaluation of small intestine transplant grafts. Transplantation. 2012; 94(7):757-62. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31825f4410. View

5.
Seisdedos Elcuaz R, Conde Garcia M, Castellanos Monedero J, Garcia-Manzanares Vazquez-de Agredos A, Valenzuela Gamez J, Fraga Fuentes M . [Central venous catheters-related infections in patients with parenteral nutrition]. Nutr Hosp. 2012; 27(3):775-80. DOI: 10.3305/nh.2012.27.3.5729. View