» Articles » PMID: 24388283

Increased Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation After Effects During Concurrent Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Overview
Journal Brain Stimul
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Jan 7
PMID 24388283
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study we tested the hypothesis whether a lasting change in the excitability of cortical output circuits can be obtained in healthy humans by combining a peripheral nerve stimulation during a concomitant depolarization and/or hyperpolarization of motor cortex. To reach this aim we combined two different neurophysiological techniques each of them able to induce a lasting increase of cortical excitability by them self: namely median nerve repetitive electrical stimulation (rEPNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Ten normal young volunteers were enrolled in the present study. All subjects underwent five different protocols of stimulation: (1, 2) tDCS alone (anodal or cathodal); (3) Sham tDCS plus rEPNS; (4, 5) anodal or cathodal tDCS plus rEPNS. The baseline MEP amplitude from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle, the FCR H-reflex were compared with that obtained immediately after and 10, 20, 30, 60 min after the stimulation protocol. Anodal tDCS alone induced a significant transient increase of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while anodal tDCS + rEPNS determined MEP changes which persisted for up 60 min. Cathodal tDCS alone induced a significant reduction of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while cathodal tDCS + rEPNS prolonged the effects for up to 60 min. Sham tDCS + rEPNS did not induce significant changes in corticospinal excitability. Anodal or cathodal tDCS + rEPNS and sham tDCS + rEPNS caused a lasting facilitation of H-reflex. These findings suggest that by providing afferent input to the motor cortex while its excitability level is increased or decreased by tDCS may be a highly effective means for inducing an enduring bi-directional plasticity. The mechanism of this protocol may be complex, involving either cortical and spinal after effects.

Citing Articles

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luo S, Wen Z, Liu Y, Sun T, Xu L, Yu Q Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1472837.

PMID: 39600429 PMC: 11588637. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1472837.


Neuroprotection of Transcranial Cortical and Peripheral Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation by Modulating a Common Neuronal Death Pathway in Mice with Ischemic Stroke.

Lee H, Lee J, Jung D, Oh H, Shin H, Choi B Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14).

PMID: 39062789 PMC: 11277498. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147546.


Top-down and bottom-up stimulation techniques combined with action observation treatment in stroke rehabilitation: a perspective.

Qi F, Nitsche M, Ren X, Wang D, Wang L Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1156987.

PMID: 37497013 PMC: 10367110. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1156987.


Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases motor cortical plasticity in healthy humans.

Koseki T, Kudo D, Yoshida K, Nito M, Takano K, Jin M Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1034451.

PMID: 37091256 PMC: 10115158. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1034451.


Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Augmented with Motor Imagery and Upper-Limb Functional Training for Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kashoo F, Al-Baradie R, Alzahrani M, Alanazi A, Manzar M, Gugnani A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22).

PMID: 36429924 PMC: 9690138. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192215199.