» Articles » PMID: 24387588

Seizure-induced Alterations in Fast-spiking Basket Cell GABA Currents Modulate Frequency and Coherence of Gamma Oscillation in Network Simulations

Overview
Journal Chaos
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Jan 7
PMID 24387588
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gamma frequency oscillations have been proposed to contribute to memory formation and retrieval. Fast-spiking basket cells (FS-BCs) are known to underlie development of gamma oscillations. Fast, high amplitude GABA synapses and gap junctions have been suggested to contribute to gamma oscillations in FS-BC networks. Recently, we identified that, apart from GABAergic synapses, FS-BCs in the hippocampal dentate gyrus have GABAergic currents mediated by extrasynaptic receptors. Our experimental studies demonstrated two specific changes in FS-BC GABA currents following experimental seizures [Yu et al., J. Neurophysiol. 109, 1746 (2013)]: increase in the magnitude of extrasynaptic (tonic) GABA currents and a depolarizing shift in GABA reversal potential (E(GABA)). Here, we use homogeneous networks of a biophysically based model of FS-BCs to examine how the presence of extrasynaptic GABA conductance (g(GABA-extra)) and experimentally identified, seizure-induced changes in g(GABA-extra) and E(GABA) influence network activity. Networks of FS-BCs interconnected by fast GABAergic synapses developed synchronous firing in the dentate gamma frequency range (40-100 Hz). Systematic investigation revealed that the biologically realistic range of 30 to 40 connections between FS-BCs resulted in greater coherence in the gamma frequency range when networks were activated by Poisson-distributed dendritic synaptic inputs rather than by homogeneous somatic current injections, which were balanced for FS-BC firing frequency in unconnected networks. Distance-dependent conduction delay enhanced coherence in networks with 30-40 FS-BC interconnections while inclusion of gap junctional conductance had a modest effect on coherence. In networks activated by somatic current injections resulting in heterogeneous FS-BC firing, increasing g(GABA-extra) reduced the frequency and coherence of FS-BC firing when E(GABA) was shunting (-74 mV), but failed to alter average FS-BC frequency when E(GABA) was depolarizing (-54 mV). When FS-BCs were activated by biologically based dendritic synaptic inputs, enhancing g(GABA-extra) reduced the frequency and coherence of FS-BC firing when E(GABA) was shunting and increased average FS-BC firing when E(GABA) was depolarizing. Shifting E(GABA) from shunting to depolarizing potentials consistently increased network frequency to and above high gamma frequencies (>80 Hz). Since gamma oscillations may contribute to learning and memory processing [Fell et al., Nat. Neurosci. 4, 1259 (2001); Jutras et al., J. Neurosci. 29, 12521 (2009); Wang, Physiol. Rev. 90, 1195 (2010)], our demonstration that network oscillations are modulated by extrasynaptic inhibition in FS-BCs suggests that neuroactive compounds that act on extrasynaptic GABA receptors could impact memory formation by modulating hippocampal gamma oscillations. The simulation results indicate that the depolarized FS-BC GABA reversal, observed after experimental seizures, together with enhanced spillover extrasynaptic GABA currents are likely to promote generation of focal high frequency activity associated with epileptic networks.

Citing Articles

Synchrony in Networks of Type 2 Interneurons Is More Robust to Noise with Hyperpolarizing Inhibition Compared to Shunting Inhibition in Both the Stochastic Population Oscillator and the Coupled Oscillator Regimes.

Baravalle R, Canavier C eNeuro. 2024; 11(3).

PMID: 38471777 PMC: 10972736. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0399-23.2024.


Degeneracy in epilepsy: multiple routes to hyperexcitable brain circuits and their repair.

Stober T, Batulin D, Triesch J, Narayanan R, Jedlicka P Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):479.

PMID: 37137938 PMC: 10156698. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04823-0.


Non-monotonic effects of GABAergic synaptic inputs on neuronal firing.

Abed Zadeh A, Turner B, Calakos N, Brunel N PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(6):e1010226.

PMID: 35666719 PMC: 9203025. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010226.


Single Neuron Optimization as a Basis for Accurate Biophysical Modeling: The Case of Cerebellar Granule Cells.

Masoli S, Rizza M, Sgritta M, Van Geit W, Schurmann F, DAngelo E Front Cell Neurosci. 2017; 11:71.

PMID: 28360841 PMC: 5350144. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00071.


Immunostaining of Biocytin-filled and Processed Sections for Neurochemical Markers.

Swietek B, Gupta A, Proddutur A, Santhakumar V J Vis Exp. 2017; (118).

PMID: 28117774 PMC: 5264554. DOI: 10.3791/54880.


References
1.
Wang X, Buzsaki G . Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model. J Neurosci. 1996; 16(20):6402-13. PMC: 6578902. View

2.
Netoff T, Clewley R, Arno S, Keck T, White J . Epilepsy in small-world networks. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(37):8075-83. PMC: 6729784. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1509-04.2004. View

3.
Glykys J, Peng Z, Chandra D, Homanics G, Houser C, Mody I . A new naturally occurring GABA(A) receptor subunit partnership with high sensitivity to ethanol. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 10(1):40-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn1813. View

4.
Farrant M, Nusser Z . Variations on an inhibitory theme: phasic and tonic activation of GABA(A) receptors. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6(3):215-29. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1625. View

5.
Skinner F . Cellular-based modeling of oscillatory dynamics in brain networks. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012; 22(4):660-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.02.001. View