» Articles » PMID: 24386952

Evaluation of a Novel Rash Scale and a Serum Proteomic Predictor in a Randomized Phase II Trial of Sequential or Concurrent Cetuximab and Pemetrexed in Previously Treated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

Background: Candidate predictive biomarkers for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi), skin rash and serum proteomic assays, require further qualification to improve EGFRi therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a phase II trial that was closed to accrual because of changes in clinical practice we examined the relationships among candidate biomarkers, quantitative changes in tumor size, progression-free and overall survival.

Methods: 55 patients with progressive NSCLC after platinum therapy were randomized to receive (Arm A) cetuximab, followed by pemetrexed at progression, or (Arm B) concurrent cetuximab and pemetrexed. All received cetuximab monotherapy for the first 14 days. Pre-treatment serum and weekly rash assessments by standard and EGFRi-induced rash (EIR) scales were collected.

Results: 43 patients (20-Arm A, 23-Arm B) completed the 14-day run-in. Median survival was 9.1 months. Arm B had better median overall (Arm B = 10.3 [95% CI 7.5, 16.8]; Arm A = 3.5 [2.8, 11.7] months P = 0.046) and progression-free survival (Arm B = 2.3 [1.6, 3.1]; Arm A = 1.6 [0.9, 1.9] months P = 0.11). The EIR scale distributed ratings among 6 rather than 3 categories but ordinal scale rash severity did not predict outcomes. The serum proteomic classifier and absence of rash after 21 days of cetuximab did.

Conclusions: Absence of rash after 21 days of cetuximab therapy and the serum proteomic classifier, but not ordinal rash severity, were associated with NSCLC outcomes. Although in a small study, these observations were consistent with results from larger retrospective analyses.

Citing Articles

Retrospective Assessment of a Serum Proteomic Test in a Phase III Study Comparing Erlotinib plus Placebo with Erlotinib plus Tivantinib (MARQUEE) in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Buttigliero C, Shepherd F, Barlesi F, Schwartz B, Orlov S, Favaretto A Oncologist. 2018; 24(6):e251-e259.

PMID: 30139835 PMC: 6656491. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0089.


Integrating Pharmacoproteomics into Early-Phase Clinical Development: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Recommendations.

Nandal S, Burt T Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(2).

PMID: 28218733 PMC: 5343982. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18020448.


Identification of a variant in KDR associated with serum VEGFR2 and pharmacodynamics of Pazopanib.

Maitland M, Xu C, Cheng Y, Kistner-Griffin E, Ryan K, Karrison T Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 21(2):365-72.

PMID: 25411163 PMC: 4323272. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1683.

References
1.
OByrne K, Gatzemeier U, Bondarenko I, Barrios C, Eschbach C, Martens U . Molecular biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(8):795-805. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70189-9. View

2.
Maitland M, Bies R, Barrett J . A time to keep and a time to cast away categories of tumor response. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(23):3109-11. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.3887. View

3.
Amann J, Lee J, Roder H, Brahmer J, Gonzalez A, Schiller J . Genetic and proteomic features associated with survival after treatment with erlotinib in first-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3503. J Thorac Oncol. 2009; 5(2):169-78. PMC: 3087978. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181c8cbd9. View

4.
Fojo A, Noonan A . RECIST: no longer the sharpest tool in the oncology clinical trials toolbox--reply to point. Cancer Res. 2012; 72(20):5150. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1989. View

5.
Sharma M, Maitland M, Ratain M . Why RECIST works and why it should stay--reply to counterpoint. Cancer Res. 2012; 72(20):5158. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1988. View