» Articles » PMID: 24375906

Evaluating Reporter Genes of Different Luciferases for Optimized in Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging of Transplanted Neural Stem Cells in the Brain

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Dec 31
PMID 24375906
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) has become the method of choice for optical tracking of cells in small laboratory animals. However, the use of luciferases from different species, depending on different substrates and emitting at distinct wavelengths, has not been optimized for sensitive neuroimaging. In order to identify the most suitable luciferase, this quantitative study compared the luciferases Luc2, CBG99, PpyRE9 and hRluc. Human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells and mouse neural stem cells were transduced by lentiviral vector-mediated transfer to express one of the four luciferases, together with copGFP. A T2A peptide linker promoted stoichiometric expression between both imaging reporters and the comparison of cell populations upon flow cytometry. Cell dilution series were used to determine highest BLI sensitivity in vitro for Luc2. However, Coelenterazine h-dependent hRluc signals clearly exceeded d-luciferin-dependent BLI in vitro. For the quantitative in vivo analysis, cells were transplanted into mouse brain and BLI was performed including the recording of emission kinetics and spectral characteristics. Differences in light kinetics were observed for d-luciferin vs Coelenterazine h. The emission spectra of Luc2 and PpyRE9 remained almost unchanged, while the emission spectrum of CBG99 became biphasic. Most importantly, photon emission decreased in the order of Luc2, CBG99, PpyRE9 to hRluc. The feasibility of combining different luciferases for dual color and dual substrate neuroimaging was tested and discussed. This investigation provides the first complete quantitative comparison of different luciferases expressed by neural stem cells. It results in a clear recommendation of Luc2 as the best luciferase selection for in vivo neuroimaging.

Citing Articles

Development of two mouse strains conditionally expressing bright luciferases with distinct emission spectra as new tools for in vivo imaging.

Nakashiba T, Ogoh K, Iwano S, Sugiyama T, Mizuno-Iijima S, Nakashima K Lab Anim (NY). 2023; 52(10):247-257.

PMID: 37679611 PMC: 10533401. DOI: 10.1038/s41684-023-01238-6.


fate of free and encapsulated iron oxide nanoparticles after injection of labelled stem cells.

Ashraf S, Taylor A, Sharkey J, Barrow M, Murray P, Wilm B Nanoscale Adv. 2022; 1(1):367-377.

PMID: 36132463 PMC: 9473218. DOI: 10.1039/c8na00098k.


Secreted Fas Decoys Enhance the Antitumor Activity of Engineered and Bystander T Cells in Fas Ligand-Expressing Solid Tumors.

Bajgain P, Torres Chavez A, Balasubramanian K, Fleckenstein L, Lulla P, Heslop H Cancer Immunol Res. 2022; 10(11):1370-1385.

PMID: 36122411 PMC: 9633434. DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-22-0115.


Near-infrared bioluminescence imaging of two cell populations in living mice.

Zambito G, Mezzanotte L STAR Protoc. 2021; 2(3):100662.

PMID: 34286293 PMC: 8273408. DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100662.


Preclinical Applications of Multi-Platform Imaging in Animal Models of Cancer.

Serkova N, Glunde K, Haney C, Farhoud M, De Lille A, Redente E Cancer Res. 2020; 81(5):1189-1200.

PMID: 33262127 PMC: 8026542. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0373.