Assessment of Dental Age of Children Aged 3.5 to 16.9 Years Using Demirjian's Method: a Meta-analysis Based on 26 Studies

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2013 Dec 25

PMID 24367690

Citations 24

Authors

Jin Yan

Xintian Lou

Liming Xie

Dedong Yu

Guofang Shen

Yilin Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: A method for assessing dental maturity in different populations was first developed in 1973 by Demirjian and has been widely used and accepted since then. While the accuracy for evaluating dental age using Demirjian's method compared to children's chronological age has been extensively studied in recent years, the results currently available remain controversial and ambiguous.

Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI and CBM databases was conducted to identify all eligible studies published before July 12th, 2013. Weighted mean difference (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to evaluate the applicability of Demirjian's method for estimating chronological age in children.

Results: A meta-analysis was conducted on 26 studies with a total of 11,499 children (5,301 boys and 6,198 girls) aged 3.5 to 16.9 years. Overall, we found that Demirjian's method overestimated dental age by 0.35 (4.2 months) and 0.39 (4.68 months) years in males and females, respectively. A subgroup analysis by age revealed that boys and girls between the ages of 5 to 14 were given a dental age estimate that was significantly more advanced than their chronological age. Differences between underestimated dental ages and actual chronological ages were lower for male and female 15- and 16-year-old subgroups, though a significant difference was found in the 16-year-old subgroup.

Conclusions: Demirjian's method's overestimation of actual chronological tooth age reveals the need for population-specific standards to better estimate the rate of human dental maturation.

Citing Articles

Symmetry in the developmental stages of permanent human teeth: a comparative study between maxilla and mandible.

Haghi Ashtiani G, Davies J, Liversidge H Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025; .

PMID: 39883323 DOI: 10.1007/s40368-024-00996-2.

Third molar maturity index for discriminating between adults and minors: validation in an Iranian sample.

Movahhedian N, Nikmanesh S, Bazooband A J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2025; 42(3):9-19.

PMID: 39752635 PMC: 11838843. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14561902.

Comparative Analysis of Dental Age Estimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Assessing Gender-Specific Accuracy of the Demirjian and Nolla Methods Across Different Age Groups.

Al-Juhani A, Binshalhoub A, Showail S, Alraythi M, Alzahrani A, Almutiri N Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75031.

PMID: 39749055 PMC: 11694602. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75031.

Artificial intelligence and dental age estimation: development and validation of an automated stage allocation technique on all mandibular tooth types in panoramic radiographs.

Matthijs L, Delande L, De Tobel J, Buyukcakir B, Claes P, Vandermeulen D Int J Legal Med. 2024; 138(6):2469-2479.

PMID: 39105781 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03298-w.

Demirjian's and Cameriere's Methods for the Assessment of Dental Age Estimation in Children from a Southern Brazilian City.

Carelli J, da Silva G, Gomes M, Vilalba T, Baratto-Filho F, Brancher J Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061650 PMC: 11276536. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141513.

References

Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

Yadava M, Roberts G, Lucas V . Dental age assessment (DAA): reference data for British children at the 10-year-old threshold. Int J Legal Med. 2010; 125(5):651-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0491-z. View

Shi G, Lie R, Tao J, Fan L, Zhu G . [Application of Demirjian's method for chronological age estimation in teenagers of Shanghai Han population]. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009; 25(3):168-71. View

Nur B, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Nur M, Kayipmaz S . Validity of demirjian and nolla methods for dental age estimation for Northeastern Turkish children aged 5-16 years old. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17(5):e871-7. PMC: 3482536. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.18034. View

Flood S, Mitchell W, Oxnard C, Turlach B, McGeachie J . A comparison of Demirjian's four dental development methods for forensic age assessment. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(6):1610-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01883.x. View

Black S, SCHEUER J . T.F.J. Huda and J.E. Bowman, Age determination from dental microstructure in juveniles: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1995 vol. 97: 135-150. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996; 101(2):305-6. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1331010203. View

Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner J . A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973; 45(2):211-27. View

Demirjian A, Buschang P, TANGUAY R, Patterson D . Interrelationships among measures of somatic, skeletal, dental, and sexual maturity. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88(5):433-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90070-3. View

Zintzaras E, Ioannidis J . Heterogeneity testing in meta-analysis of genome searches. Genet Epidemiol. 2004; 28(2):123-37. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20048. View

10.

Mani S, Naing L, John J, Samsudin A . Comparison of two methods of dental age estimation in 7-15-year-old Malays. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008; 18(5):380-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00890.x. View

11.

Filipsson R . A new method for assessment of dental maturity using the individual curve of number of erupted permanent teeth. Ann Hum Biol. 1975; 2(1):13-24. DOI: 10.1080/03014467500000521. View

12.

Chudasama P, Roberts G, Lucas V . Dental age assessment (DAA): a study of a Caucasian population at the 13 year threshold. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011; 19(1):22-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2011.09.008. View

13.

Hegde R, Sood P . Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: radiographic evaluation of dental age in 6 to 13 years children of Belgaum using Demirjian methods. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2003; 20(4):132-8. View

14.

Eid R, Simi R, Friggi M, Fisberg M . Assessment of dental maturity of Brazilian children aged 6 to 14 years using Demirjian's method. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002; 12(6):423-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2002.00403.x. View

15.

Nik-Hussein N, Kee K, Gan P . Validity of Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation for Malaysian children aged 5-15 years old. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 204(1-3):208.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.08.020. View

16.

Leurs I, Wattel E, Aartman I, Etty E, Prahl-Andersen B . Dental age in Dutch children. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27(3):309-14. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji010. View

17.

Sapoka A, Demirjian A . Dental development of the French Canadian child. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor). 1971; 37(3):100-4. View

18.

Bagherian A, Sadeghi M . Assessment of dental maturity of children aged 3.5 to 13.5 years using the Demirjian method in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci. 2011; 53(1):37-42. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.53.37. View

19.

Sukhia R, Fida M, Azam S . Dental age table for a sample of Pakistani children. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 34(1):77-82. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq161. View

20.

Rozylo-Kalinowska I, Kolasa--Raczka A, Kalinowski P . Relationship between dental age according to Demirjian and cervical vertebrae maturity in Polish children. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 33(1):75-83. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq031. View