» Articles » PMID: 24354621

Detection of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI: Is the Addition of Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0T Beneficial?

Overview
Journal J Dig Dis
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2013 Dec 21
PMID 24354621
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine whether adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly for small lesions (≤2 cm) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Methods: Data of patients diagnosed with focal liver lesions who had undergone gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T MRI and DWI were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists (the observers) reviewed independently MRI images in two reading sessions, that is, gadoxetic acid-enhanced images alone and the combination of DWI (b values: 0 and 600 s/mm(2) ) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced images. They assigned to each lesion a confidence level based on a five-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for the detection of HCC were calculated.

Results: Both observers found the AUROC of the gadoxetic acid-enhanced images was slightly higher than that of the combined DWI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI images in the detection of HCC (observer 1: 0.947 ± 0.030 vs 0.896 ± 0.042, Z = 1.478, P = 0.139; observer 2: 0.917 ± 0.038 vs 0.868 ± 0.048, Z = 1.296, P = 0.195). The sensitivity for the gadoxetic acid set alone was slightly higher than that for the combined set for observer 1 (97% vs 84%) and slightly lower for observer 2 (74% vs 82%). The PPVs were slightly higher for the gadoxetic acid set alone than for the combined set for both observers (observer 1, 89% vs 80%; observer 2, 93% vs 78%); however, none of the differences were statistically significant (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: There is no benefit in adding DWI to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the detection of HCC at 3.0T.

Citing Articles

Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Nadarevic T, Colli A, Giljaca V, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Manzotti C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 5:CD014798.

PMID: 35521901 PMC: 9074390. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014798.pub2.


A meta-analysis of the added value of diffusion weighted imaging in combination with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesser or equal to 2 cm.

Lan H, Lin G, Zhong W Oncol Lett. 2020; 20(3):2739-2748.

PMID: 32782590 PMC: 7400770. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11805.


Study on the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma caused by hepatitis B cirrhosis via multi-slice spiral CT and MRI.

Wang M, Wei C, Shi Z, Zhu J Oncol Lett. 2018; 15(1):503-508.

PMID: 29375718 PMC: 5766070. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7313.


Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update.

Omata M, Cheng A, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee J, Jia J Hepatol Int. 2017; 11(4):317-370.

PMID: 28620797 PMC: 5491694. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9.


Diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and the concordance rate of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS).

Bae J, Kim J, Yu M, Lee D, Kim H, Chung J PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0178495.

PMID: 28558068 PMC: 5448778. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178495.