» Articles » PMID: 24344752

Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Interventions with Potential for Inpatient Cost Reduction

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Dec 19
PMID 24344752
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Healthcare costs are increasing rapidly and at an unsustainable rate in many countries, and inpatient hospitalizations are a significant driver of these costs. Clinical decision support (CDS) represents a promising approach to not only improve care but to reduce costs in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to systematically review trials of CDS interventions with the potential to reduce inpatient costs, so as to identify promising interventions for more widespread implementation and to inform future research in this area.

Methods: To identify relevant studies, MEDLINE was searched up to July 2013. CDS intervention studies with the potential to reduce inpatient healthcare costs were identified through titles and abstracts, and full text articles were reviewed to make a final determination on inclusion. Relevant characteristics of the studies were extracted and summarized.

Results: Following a screening of 7,663 articles, 78 manuscripts were included. 78.2% of studies were controlled before-after studies, and 15.4% were randomized controlled trials. 53.8% of the studies were focused on pharmacotherapy. The majority of manuscripts were published during or after 2008. 70.5% of the studies resulted in statistically and clinically significant improvements in an explicit financial measure or a proxy financial measure. Only 12.8% of the studies directly measured the financial impact of an intervention, whereas the financial impact was inferred in the remainder of studies. Data on cost effectiveness was available for only one study.

Conclusions: Significantly more research is required on the impact of clinical decision support on inpatient costs. In particular, there is a remarkable gap in the availability of cost effectiveness studies required by policy makers and decision makers in healthcare systems.

Citing Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support to Improve CKD Outcomes Among First Nations Australians.

Chen W, Howard K, Gorham G, Abeyaratne A, Zhao Y, Adegboye O Kidney Int Rep. 2025; 10(2):549-564.

PMID: 39990899 PMC: 11843118. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.10.028.


Development and Pilot Implementation of Neotree, a Digital Quality Improvement Tool Designed to Improve Newborn Care and Survival in 3 Hospitals in Malawi and Zimbabwe: Cost Analysis Study.

Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Hull-Bailey T, Nkhoma D, Chiyaka T, Wilson E, Fitzgerald F JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023; 11:e50467.

PMID: 38153802 PMC: 10766148. DOI: 10.2196/50467.


Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice.

White N, Carter H, Kularatna S, Borg D, Brain D, Tariq A J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(6):1205-1218.

PMID: 36972263 PMC: 10198542. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad040.


Design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of contemporary chronic disease clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen W, Howard K, Gorham G, OBryan C, Coffey P, Balasubramanya B J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022; 29(10):1757-1772.

PMID: 35818299 PMC: 9471723. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac110.


Effects of patients' hospital discharge preferences on uptake of clinical decision support.

Cox J, Leeds I, Sadiraj V, Schnier K, Sweeney J PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0247270.

PMID: 33684144 PMC: 7939268. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247270.


References
1.
Shojania K, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsay C, Eccles M, Grimshaw J . Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2010; 182(5):E216-25. PMC: 2842864. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090578. View

2.
Bates D, Teich J, Lee J, Seger D, Kuperman G, Maluf N . The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999; 6(4):313-21. PMC: 61372. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1999.00660313. View

3.
Chertow G, Lee J, Kuperman G, Burdick E, Horsky J, Seger D . Guided medication dosing for inpatients with renal insufficiency. JAMA. 2001; 286(22):2839-44. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.22.2839. View

4.
Bright T, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux R . Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(1):29-43. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450. View

5.
Meyfroidt G, Wouters P, De Becker W, Cottem D, Van den Berghe G . Impact of a computer-generated alert system on the quality of tight glycemic control. Intensive Care Med. 2011; 37(7):1151-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2159-7. View