Adopting a Blended Learning Approach to Teaching Evidence Based Medicine: a Mixed Methods Study

Overview

Journal BMC Med Educ

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Education

Date 2013 Dec 18

PMID 24341502

Citations 28

Authors

Dragan Ilic

William Hart

Patrick Fiddes

Marie Misso

Elmer Villanueva

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is a core unit delivered across many medical schools. Few studies have investigated the most effective method of teaching a course in EBM to medical students. The objective of this study was to identify whether a blended-learning approach to teaching EBM is more effective a didactic-based approach at increasing medical student competency in EBM.

Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted consisting of a controlled trial and focus groups with second year graduate medical students. Students received the EBM course delivered using either a didactic approach (DID) to learning EBM or a blended-learning approach (BL). Student competency in EBM was assessed using the Berlin tool and a criterion-based assessment task, with student perceptions on the interventions assessed qualitatively.

Results: A total of 61 students (85.9%) participated in the study. Competency in EBM did not differ between the groups when assessed using the Berlin tool (p = 0.29). Students using the BL approach performed significantly better in one of the criterion-based assessment tasks (p = 0.01) and reported significantly higher self-perceived competence in critical appraisal skills. Qualitative analysis identified that students had a preference for the EBM course to be delivered using the BL approach.

Conclusions: Implementing a blended-learning approach to EBM teaching promotes greater student appreciation of EBM principles within the clinical setting. Integrating a variety of teaching modalities and approaches can increase student self-confidence and assist in bridging the gap between the theory and practice of EBM.

Citing Articles

Influence of research evidence on the use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in primary care: an exploratory qualitative interview study.

Ban J, Perera R, Williams V BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):194.

PMID: 37730553 PMC: 10512575. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02155-w.

Development and Piloting of a Web-Based Tool to Teach Relative and Absolute Risk Reductions.

Zacher S, Berger-Hoger B, Luhnen J, Steckelberg A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(23).

PMID: 36498161 PMC: 9739880. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316086.

The use of a technology-assisted and teacher-supervised online discussion platform to promote academic progress in blended embryology courses.

Gong L, Song Y, Xu Y, Wang M, Ma H, Liu W BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):817.

PMID: 36447283 PMC: 9706879. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03890-x.

A Blended Approach to Learning in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program: Proof of Concept.

Taylor F, Nelson E, Delfino K, Han H J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022; 2.

PMID: 35187254 PMC: 8855447. DOI: 10.4137/JMECD.S32063.

Assessing the compliance of educational curricula of selected disciplines with the content standards of cancer-related palliative care.

Ebadinejad Z, Rassouli M, Fakhr-Movahedi A J Educ Health Promot. 2021; 10:247.

PMID: 34485544 PMC: 8395876. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1415_20.

References

Cheng H, Guo F, Hsu T, Chuang S, Yen H, Lee F . Two strategies to intensify evidence-based medicine education of undergraduate students: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012; 41(1):4-11. View

Grasl M, Pokieser P, Gleiss A, Brandstaetter J, Sigmund T, Erovic B . A new blended learning concept for medical students in otolaryngology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 138(4):358-66. DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2012.145. View

Davis D, OBrien M, Freemantle N, Wolf F, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A . Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?. JAMA. 1999; 282(9):867-74. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.9.867. View

Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray J, Haynes R, Richardson W . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996; 312(7023):71-2. PMC: 2349778. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. View

Ruiz J, Mintzer M, Issenberg S . Learning objects in medical education. Med Teach. 2007; 28(7):599-605. DOI: 10.1080/01421590601039893. View

Holmboe E, Hawkins R . Methods for evaluating the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine: a review. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 129(1):42-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-1-199807010-00011. View

Davis J, Chryssafidou E, Zamora J, Davies D, Khan K, Coomarasamy A . Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2007; 7:23. PMC: 3225809. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-23. View

Lincoln M, McAllister L . Peer learning in clinical education. Med Teach. 1993; 15(1):17-25. DOI: 10.3109/01421599309029007. View

Thangaratinam S, Barnfield G, Weinbrenner S, Meyerrose B, Arvanitis T, Horvath A . Teaching trainers to incorporate evidence-based medicine (EBM) teaching in clinical practice: the EU-EBM project. BMC Med Educ. 2009; 9:59. PMC: 2753626. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-59. View

10.

Hutchinson L . Educational environment. BMJ. 2003; 326(7393):810-2. PMC: 1125718. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.810. View

11.

Sastre E, Denny J, McCoy J, McCoy A, Spickard 3rd A . Teaching evidence-based medicine: Impact on students' literature use and inpatient clinical documentation. Med Teach. 2011; 33(6):e306-12. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565827. View

12.

McAlister F, Graham I, KARR G, Laupacis A . Evidence-based medicine and the practicing clinician. J Gen Intern Med. 1999; 14(4):236-42. PMC: 1496564. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00323.x. View

13.

Varkey P, Karlapudi S, Rose S, Nelson R, Warner M . A systems approach for implementing practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2009; 84(3):335-9. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819731fb. View

14.

Coomarasamy A, Khan K . What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ. 2004; 329(7473):1017. PMC: 524555. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1017. View

15.

Lehmann R, Bosse H, Simon A, Nikendei C, Huwendiek S . An innovative blended learning approach using virtual patients as preparation for skills laboratory training: perceptions of students and tutors. BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13:23. PMC: 3599450. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-23. View

16.

McGaghie W, Issenberg S, Petrusa E, Scalese R . A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ. 2010; 44(1):50-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x. View

17.

Finkel M, Brown H, Gerber L, Supino P . Teaching evidence-based medicine to medical students. Med Teach. 2003; 25(2):202-4. DOI: 10.1080/0142159031000092634. View

18.

Oude Rengerink K, Thangaratinam S, Barnfield G, Suter K, Horvath A, Walczak J . How can we teach EBM in clinical practice? An analysis of barriers to implementation of on-the-job EBM teaching and learning. Med Teach. 2011; 33(3):e125-30. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.542520. View

19.

Upton D, Upton P . Knowledge and use of evidence-based practice of GPs and hospital doctors. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006; 12(3):376-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00602.x. View

20.

Ilic D . Assessing competency in Evidence Based Practice: strengths and limitations of current tools in practice. BMC Med Educ. 2009; 9:53. PMC: 2728711. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-53. View