» Articles » PMID: 24336559

ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot Project: Patient Perceptions

Overview
Date 2013 Dec 17
PMID 24336559
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe the perceptions of those who received invitations to the ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot (the Pilot) about the mailed invitation, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in general, and their specific screening experiences.

Design: Qualitative study with 6 focus group sessions, each 1.5 hours in length.

Setting: Hamilton, Ont; Ottawa, Ont; and Thunder Bay, Ont.

Participants: Screening-eligible adults, aged 50 years and older, who received a Pilot invitation for CRC screening.

Methods: The focus groups were conducted by a trained moderator and were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed using grounded-theory techniques facilitated by the use of electronic software.

Main Findings: Key themes related to the invitation letter, the role of the family physician, direct mailing of the fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) kit, and alternate CRC screening promotion strategies were identified. Specifically, participants suggested the letter content should use stronger, more powerful language to capture the reader's attention. The importance of the family physician was endorsed, although participants favoured clarification of the physician and program roles in the actual mailed invitation. Participants expressed support for directly mailing FOBT kits to individuals, particularly those with successful previous test completion, and for communication of both negative and positive screening results.

Conclusion: This study yielded a number of important findings including strategies to optimize letter content, support for directly mailed FOBT kits, and strategies to report results that might be highly relevant to other health programs where population-based CRC screening is being considered.

Citing Articles

National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Lithuania: Description of the 5-Year Performance on Population Level.

Dulskas A, Poskus T, Kildusiene I, Patasius A, Stulpinas R, Laurinavicius A Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(5).

PMID: 33800772 PMC: 7961359. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051129.


Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening Programme in the Basque Country (Spain) and its effectiveness based on the Miscan-colon model.

Idigoras I, Arrospide A, Portillo I, Arana-Arri E, Martinez-Indart L, Mar J BMC Public Health. 2017; 18(1):78.

PMID: 28764731 PMC: 5540568. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4639-3.


Equity and practice issues in colorectal cancer screening: Mixed-methods study.

Buchman S, Rozmovits L, Glazier R Can Fam Physician. 2016; 62(4):e186-93.

PMID: 27618142 PMC: 4830674.

References
1.
Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen O, Sondergaard O . Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996; 348(9040):1467-71. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7. View

2.
Senore C, Armaroli P, Silvani M, Andreoni B, Bisanti L, Marai L . Comparing different strategies for colorectal cancer screening in Italy: predictors of patients' participation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 105(1):188-98. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.583. View

3.
Center M, Jemal A, Ward E . International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18(6):1688-94. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0090. View

4.
Tinmouth J, Ritvo P, McGregor S, Guglietti C, Green J, Claus D . ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: family physician perceptions. Can Fam Physician. 2012; 58(10):e570-7. PMC: 3470535. View

5.
Beeker C, Kraft J, Southwell B, Jorgensen C . Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention. J Community Health. 2000; 25(3):263-78. DOI: 10.1023/a:1005104406934. View